Scientific Research Debunks LGBT Propaganda

The LGBT Lie Refuted In This Article:  “Born That Way.”





Scientific Research Debunks LGBT Propaganda

Liberty Counsel

Public Relations Department
407-875-1776 office

407-462-9715 cell

August 23, 2016


WASHINGTON — A new exhaustive scientific study conducted by two Johns Hopkins University scientists reveals that scientific evidence does not support the “born that way” claim regarding homosexuality or the “trapped in the body” so-called transgender claim. Written by Dr. Lawrence S. Mayer and Dr. Paul R. McHugh, this study evaluates data from over 200 peer-reviewed studies regarding sexual orientation and gender identity.


Regarding “sexual orientation,” the study concludes: “The understanding of sexual orientation as an innate, biologically-fixed property of human beings – the idea that people are ‘born that way’- is not supported by scientific evidence.”


Regarding “gender identity,” the study states: “The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex – that a person might be ‘a man trapped in a woman’s body’ or ‘a woman trapped in a man’s body,’- is not supported by scientific evidence.


Regarding health, the research reveals non-heterosexuals experience 1.5 times more anxiety and depression, 1.5 times more substance abuse, and 2.5 times the risk of suicide than heterosexuals. Suicide attempts by transgender individuals are estimated at 41 percent compared to less than five percent of the overall population.  The study shows a very small portion of the population, less than one percent, identify as transgender. It also concludes there is no evidence to suggest that children should be encouraged to become transgender if they act or speak in a way that is typical of their opposite gender and warns against any treatments or surgeries on young people who identify with the opposite gender.


“We are uniquely created by God as male and female. There are not multiple variants of gender. The human race is binary – male and female. It’s time to stop pushing this deceptive agenda and enabling such mental confusion,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel. “The scientific facts do not support the harmful LGBT agenda. Common sense demands we stop rebelling against nature,” said Staver.


About Liberty Counsel


Liberty Counsel is an international nonprofit, litigation, education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and the family since 1989, by providing pro bono assistance and representation on these and related topics.


© Copyright 2016 Liberty Counsel. All rights reserved.

Trump Was Right About Obama And Clinton Creating Isis



Predicted current policies would lead to Islamic state in Syria

The Obama administration’s “willful blindness” is exposed as never before from the inside in “See Something, Say Nothing: A Homeland Security Officer Exposes the Government’s Submission to Jihad,” by former DHS officer Philip Haney and WND Editor Art Moore.



Ben-Hur consists of three famous films:

1)The 1925 silent epic which was “state of the art” for its’ day.

2)The 1959 classic, winner of 11 academy awards.

3)Just released-

Image result for ben-hur

2016 ‧ Drama film/Action ‧ 2h 30m

Judah Ben-Hur (Jack Huston) loses everything after his adopted brother Messala (Toby Kebbell), now an officer in the Roman army, returns to Jerusalem and accuses the young prince of treason. Stripped of his title and separated from his wife (Nazanin Boniadi) and family, Ben-Hur must endure years of slavery on a galley at sea. When fate brings the estranged brothers to an epic and deadly chariot race, Ben-Hur finally gets the chance to exact vengeance on the man who destroyed his life.
Release date: August 19, 2016 (USA)
Budget: 100 million USD


I saw the recent release of Ben-Hur and I thought the movie was very good.  I have also seen the 1925 silent film version and the classic (11 Academy Awards Version) 1959 film with Charlton Heston.  The recent release had different slants in the story line which is always refreshing.  The movie went into detail about Judah Ben-Hur and his adopted brother Messala’s boyhood.  Messala helped save Judah’s life when he was thrown from his horse.  Messala felt he did not fit in with the Ben-Hur’s aristocratic family and went to Rome to find his fortune.  Upon Messala’s return, he imprisoned the entire Ben-Hur family.  In the 1959 epic film, a loose tile on the roof of their home fell near the marching Roman leader by accident.  In the new film, the harbinger that lead to the families’ imprisonment was a Jewish Zealot who deliberately shot an arrow at the Roman leader and just missed him.  Once again, the Ben-Hur family was falsely accused of the crime.  Judah Ben-Hur  had no relationship with Quintus Arrius in the new film and did not save his life, leading to Judah’s freedom.  I do not recall Quintus Arrius in this movie at all.  Judah broke free from the chains while the ship was sinking, and ended up on the shore where the Arabian lived, whose horses he ran in the Jerusalem chariot race.  He won the race as well as his freedom.  Judah saw Jesus a couple of times prior to His crucifixion, and this movie emphasized Judah’s conversion much more so; and unlike the ’59 version, Judah was at the cross while Jesus was crucified.  Judah’s salvation was much more personal and highlighted.  The characterization of Jesus Christ was very good, and different from the previous movie.  [Jesus, the God man, is always a challenge to portray, and both movies did a great job].  The chariot race was a technological marvel.  The Jerusalem amphitheater was built into a mountain and the race was extremely brutal.  The graphics were spectacular.  The Roman blood lust was really emphasized!  Unlike the ’59 version, Messala did not die after the race, full of hate.  He observed Judah’s conversion, and he too, laid down his sword and hatred.  The Ben-Hur family was reestablished in their Jerusalem home along with Messala rejoining them.   It was called a box office bust by the critics, but I thought it was a very good movie.  I would encourage Christians to see this classic movie, remade once again.  I will purchase the DVD once it is available.

Pastor Steve  <><


Sexual Sin And Hypocrisy In The Church

The theme of sodomy/homosexuality is a hot button topic today, frequently coming up in conversation.  President Obama is doing everything he can, in order to promote the acceptance of this sinful lifestyle throughout our country.  Rainbow colors have been splashed on the White House, as the Supreme Court advocated “gay marriage” through a 5-4 vote.  The Bible is replete with scriptures in both the Old and New Testaments, that label sodomy as not only a sin but an abomination.  All three monotheistic religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam) unequivocally condemn this sin.  The Christian church needs to show love for people engrossed in this lifestyle, but there is a dire need for those who engage in this practice to repent.  There is no free pass – this is not a “special” sin we overlook.  The challenge the church has, in my opinion, is dealing with those who engage in this lifestyle, and erroneously interpret God’s demand for repentance as hatred.  The church needs to be consistent in revealing the sinners’ need for contrition in order to be saved.  Helping people to see their sin is love.  If there is no repentance on the sinners’ part, we continue to show them unconditional love, yet they will not be allowed to join with the body of Christ.

Now here is where it gets dicey.  If we were to converse  in church about the aforementioned paragraph, we would all be on the same page.  But if I am presiding over conversation and I mention the sin of fornication, then things get quiet.  All of the sudden, the aura of self righteous condemnation dissipates.  I observe changes in body language, inflection of tone in speech, and even stone cold silence.  Fornication, of course, is the generic sweeping term that includes any kind of sexual union outside of holy matrimony.  Any relationship outside of marriage is absolutely forbidden.  As the old joke goes:  “Preacher, you have left preaching and gone to meddling.”  No, the message is now focused on your sin or your struggle.  This is the premier sin that I have run into in the church for well over three decades.  Our culture is so base today, that in many a church, fornication flies under the radar.  I have seen many who are living this lifestyle, come to church consistently, and never come under conviction!  The Bible tells us that an unrepentant fornicator will not go to heaven.  We are glad when all people come to church, but the desired effect of anyone’s attendance is for their repentance, without which one cannot be saved!  If blatant sexual sinners are consistently attending church without a change in their hearts, it is evident that the entire counsel of God is not being preached or adhered to.  If they keep living in sin without a change of heart, they become “leaven” in the church, and they convince visitors and enquirers, that this must be all right, because absolutely no one confronts the issue!  This also gives the enemies of God a chance to blaspheme, since they look inside the church and conclude that if their lifestyle is no different from mine, why should I be a part of the church?  Good question.

The church in America will continue to decline dramatically until if/when we once again become the church the way the Lord meant for it to be – described graphically in the book of Acts.

Ephesians 5:3 King James Version (KJV)

But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;


If you take issue with this article, your problem is not with the blog author.  It is with the Author of the first book run off the Gutenberg printing press – the Bible.  i.e. Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13, I Kings 14:24, I Kings 15:12, Judges 19:22-30, Genesis 18:20, Genesis 19:4-14, Genesis 13:13, I Timothy 1:10, I Corinthians 6:9, Romans 1:26-27, Hebrews 12:16, Hebrews 13:4, Jude 6-7, II Corinthians 12:21, Galatians 5:19, Ephesians 5:3, Colossians 3:5, Revelation 21:8, Luke 13:3, Luke 13:5, Matthew 4:17, etc., etc., etc., etc.

<><   Pastor Steve  

Religious outreach: Can Donald Trump reach faith voters? | Fox News Video

From the Desk of Mike Huckabee
Dear Friend:
Last Friday I substituted for Sean Hannity on the Fox News Channel, and invited Franklin Graham, Dr. Robert Jeffress and the American Renewal Project’s David Lane to be my guests.
We say every four years, “The is the most important election in our lifetime.” This truly is! If Evangelical and Pro-Life Catholic Christians do not register and vote on Election Day, the encroachment of transgender bathrooms by the Obama Administration is only the beginning. Kentucky clerk Kim Davis’ incarceration last September will be only the warmup act. YOU are next!”
A word to my pastor friends:  Donald Trump used a term last week at the American Renewal Project’s pastors and pews event in Orlando, in association with the repeal of the Johnson Amendment– “Leverage”. Mr. Trump said the Evangelical pastors influence in the public square had been severely damaged since TX Senator Lyndon Johnson wrote and passed the bill — as a reaction to conservative opposition in his run for reelection in 1954.
If Evangelical and Pro-Life Catholic Believers stay home on November 8, 2016, like we did in 2012 and 2008, we have only ourselves to blame for the collapse of the Biblical-based culture in America. You, His under-shepherds, must lead the way for the spiritual resurrection of America.
No one believes, as Chuck Colson said, that the Kingdom of God is going to arrive on Air Force One. But somebody’s values are going to be represented in the public square, and we must engage the culture with men and women of Issachar who “know the times and know what to do.” (1 Chronicles 12:32)
Mike Huckabee

American Renewal Project

Facing the Collapse of a Biblically-based Culture

Douglas Woodward And The Pre Tribulation Rapture Of The Church

Doug expounds on his interpretation of the rapture and the timing, but more importantly, he shares what our attitudes should be towards believers with other eschatological points of view:



Our hope and desire is to provide useful articles and resources for you and our Christian community. Just click on the title below … Enjoy!



    S.Douglas Woodward

    The Family Squabble Has Gotten Out of Control

    Allow me to begin this article with one heartfelt word:  *Sigh*

    There is so much debate right now between the various camps holding differing positions on the timing of the rapture, an outsider would look at the situation in the pre-millennial prophecy community and assume we are enemies rather than family.  You would think, based upon what has been said recently, we are forgetting that our adversaries are the teachings of antagonistic secular humanists, new age pantheists, and radical Muslims. That is a shame, for we are forgetting our prime directive given to us by Jesus and repeated by the Apostles Paul, John, and Peter:  to love one another as Christ loves His Church. “And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.” (I John 3:23) (See also John 13:24, 15:12; 1 Thessalonians 3:12, 4:9; 1 Peter 3:8)  But this is plenty of vitriol within the family and accusations flying back and forth.  Passion and zeal have intermingled with dogmatic partisanship and the debate over the rapture flourishes again, hotter now than ever.


    Rapture and Resurrection — What is the timing of these events?

    To make it clear up front, I am predisposed toward a Pre-Trib point of view. I characterize myself in this way, not carelessly nor without respect for the other perspectives, for I have always been given to seeing another’s point of view.  As a teacher I do my best to encourage my students to develop their own point of view–to present the alternative teachings and study the scripture, THEN purpose that they make up their own mind.  I teach that way, not because there are many truths and one truth is as good as another, but because God gave each of us a mind and made us moral agents.

    There is no escaping the fact that we are responsible for what we choose to believe.  By studying for ourselves and asking for enlightenment from the Holy Spirit, we should form our beliefs and be able to give a reason for the hope that is within us.  “But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear.” (1 Peter 3:15)  Peter also teaches that no scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation (2 Peter 1:21) for the prophecies came from prophets moved by the Spirit of God, not by the will of men. They are God’s words and not open to interpretation. That being said–that there abides one truth and one right interpretation–in regard to the timing of the rapture, there remains plenty of room for God’s people to miss that right interpretation.  Mistaking what comprises the correct point of view can be because we don’t want to know the truth and we hide from the light of truth.  But in this squabble, we should not begin by assuming that those who disagree with us do so because they are being dishonest, seek to injure us, or lack earnestness to learn what the Bible teaches.

    Therefore, we should seek to work together to learn the singular, biblically correct interpretation and to do so in charity and humility.  We should not disparage those whose interpretation is different than ours, but to uphold them in prayer and fellowship even as we express our disagreement based upon our understanding of the scripture.

    But allow me to go further:  Those who disagree with our view on the rapture, and do so based upon their understanding of the Word of the Lord, are neither apostates nor heretics.  They are not uncaring nor unfaithful.  Pre-Tribbers are not escapists; Post-Tribbers are not masochists.  If pastors, they serve the Lord in good faith and teach in accordance to what they have learned.  To accuse those we disagree with with any of these motives constitutes a moral lapse on our part.  To be angry with them, to call them ignorant or unthinking comprises a serious sin which Christ solemnly warns us against. “But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca (“Good-for-nothing”) shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.” (Matthew 5:22)  The time has come to place this insight and commandment of our personal point of view above what we deem constitutes doctrinal correctness.  We should stand up for what we believe, but not while we tear someone else down.  To do less, is to dishonor God who commanded we love one another and Him with all our heart, soul, and mind.

    A Frequent Charge Leveled Against the Pre-Trib Position

    Having presented the previous as my context for speaking on the topic, allow me to narrow my focus to just one matter:  whether there is a single verse that proves the Pre-Trib rapture interpretation of the resurrection and coming of Christ for His saints. It is indeed one of the arguments advanced against those who espouse the Pre-Tribulation rapture of the church, that we should be able to “name one verse that proves the Pre-Trib position is true.”  The argument obviously originates with a brother or sister (usually a brother!) that takes the view that the rapture happens right before the wrath of God is poured out on an unbelieving and unrepentant world, or one who believes that the rapture and the visible Second Coming of Christ happens immediately before (or maybe one 24-hour period before [1] the visible return of Christ to this earth.  Of course, these latter two views are the Pre-Wrath and Post-Trib point of view.  But the arguer when advancing his or her argument assumes that there isn’t one verse that by itself can prove the Pre-Trib position stands true.  Furthermore, the “arguer” assumes (wrongly I might add) that if there isn’t any single verse that clearly states the Pre-Trib position (and eschews the others), then, obviously, the doctrine of the Pre-Trib view must be wrong.  In other words, any doctrine worth its salt must have at least one, clearcut verse (not passage mind you, just a verse) that says explicitly, “Jesus Christ comes for His Church before the “Tribulation Period of the Last Days” commences.

    Lot Flees from the Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah

    The fact of the matter is that any doctrine worth its salt will indeed have several verses (that to those who believe the doctrine) seemingly offering substantial corroboration, as well as evincing whole passages that teach the doctrinal truth, as well as scores of hints and antitypes scattered throughout the scripture, and furthermore, will correspond and

    coordinate with other biblical doctrines.  Despite this being so, on the other hand, for the unbeliever in a doctrine, who has his or her mind made up “for good” and likely fears changing his or her mind for one of many reasons (some psychological, some prideful, some scriptural), the opposite will be true.  One verse won’t convince them, whole

    passages won’t convince them, antitypes  scattered throughout the Bible will be discounted, and other doctrines that could reinforce the doctrine in question will be dismissed as obviously unrelated if not totally antithetical to it.  Ladies and gentlemen:  That constitutes the way we humans are wired.  As the saying goes, once we have a horse in the

    race and the betting window closes, we are more than reluctant to give up on that horse.

    Three of those “Just One Verse” Verses

    With this as backdrop, allow me then as one who believes the Pre-Trib rapture has merit and is supported by scripture, to recite just a few verses that we who believe this way ascribe as scriptural evidence for our position.  For those who believe otherwise, these verses can be interpreted in such a way as to not support the Pre-Trib understanding.  That is a given.  Nevertheless, these few verses hold meaning to me to substantiate that the rapture comes before the time of great tribulation.  I will quote both the traditional King James version as well as the New English Translation (a more modern version but based on more numerous and more highly regarded Greek manuscripts) just to show that the meaning of the verses isn’t altered by moving from one version to another.  Then I will provide some very modest commentary just to make my point in this article.  Now, the three one-verse rejoinders:

    Luke 21:36–Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man. (KJV)

    But stay alert at all times, praying that you may have strength to escape all these things that must happen, and to stand before the Son of Man.” (NET)

    Revelation 3:10--Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. (KJV) Because you have kept my admonition to endure steadfastly, I will also keep you from the hour of testing that is about to come on the whole world to test those who live on the earth.  (NET)

    1 Thessalonians 5:9–For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ. (KJV)

    For God did not destine us for wrath but for gaining salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ. (NET)

    As we read these verses, please understand they do not prove any of the rapture positions outright.  But they can support any of the positions, including the Pre-Trib position. There are antitypes in the Old Testament of being “kept from” (as in preserving–think of Noah and his family, or Daniel in the Lion’s Den) as well as rescued from (as in escaping--think of Lot and his daughters, or Rahab from Jericho).  These verses, all three, or any one support the Pre-Trib rapture.  But like other “single verses” that support other doctrines, they need to be read in light of the meaning of resurrection, the meaning of salvation, and God’s antitypes like the harpazo (or rapture) of Enoch and of Elijah.

    The Parousia–The Coming of the Lord

    The IVP Bible Background Commentary (New Testament) Craig S. Keener provides this same perspective in which any of the various views of the rapture can be supported, including the Pre-Trib point of view:

    Apocalypses sometimes prophesied special deliverance (i.e., protection) for the righteous in the coming times of hardship; the Old Testament also promised God’s faithfulness to his people in such times… Some texts (e.g., the Dead Sea Scrolls) spoke of the righteous being tested by the future time of suffering, although the motif of the righteous  being tested in sufferings in general was a common one (“Keep from” could mean “protect from” [cf.Rev 7:3; cf. Jn 17:15, the only other New Testament use of the construction] or “preserve from.”)  Revelation probably contrasts the wicked “earth dwellers” with the righteous “heaven dwellers”; apocalypses (like 4 Ezra, Similitudes of Enoch and 2 Baruch) also announce judgments on the “inhabitants of the earth.” [2]

    In regards to Luke 21:36, Keener points out the same perspective again:  the verse could easily support a Pre-Trib point of view, but one can’t be dogmatic about it.

    “Strength to escape” (v. 36) could refer back to the escape of verse (Luke 21:) 21 or to enduring the persecutions of verses 12-19; “standing before the Son of Man” may mean persevering or being presented triumphant before him. [3]

    When we come to the verse in 1 Thessalonians 5:9, those who discount that this verse refers to the wrath of God described in Revelation’s “trials, vials and trumpets” argue that the salvation proclaimed here is soteriological  salvation–in short, being saved from God’s wrath in hell not from the wrath of God poured out on the “earth dwellers”

    in John’s apocalypse.  However, I disagree strongly on this point primarily because the entire context of Paul’s discourse relates to the day of the Lord (1 Thessalonians 5:2) coming as a thief to those who are “in the dark”.  Paul admonishes them that they are not living in the dark, but in the light.  They are children of the day so they WILL NOT be caught by surprise (so long as they live by faith, live soberly, put on the breastplate of righteousness, etc.). Whether they wake or sleep (5:10) they will live together with Christ.  The use of those terms, waking and sleeping, reminds us of Paul’s exquisite wording on the rapture and resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15:51: “We shall not all sleep but we shall all be changed.”   And likewise, his introduction to this passage from 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18, “concerning them that have fallen asleep.”  At a future great day, the Lord will bring with him those that have fallen asleep, and “Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.”  (1 Thessalonians 4:17).

    From my point of view, the argument advanced against the Pre-Trib position (“there is not one verse that proves it”) is a two-edged sword.  There is no verse that disproves it unless it is taken out of context and detached from the rest of  biblical teaching. There are indeed many arguments pro and con:  And I believe all of those arguments can be adduced in support of or against any of the positions held on the timing of the rapture.  That doesn’t mean that they are all equally true; contrariwise, it does not mean that none of them are true.  One will be proven true.  And frankly, as we get closer and closer to the great tribulation of the last days the correct point of view will become rather obvious.  In the meantime, I believe we are called to continue to study the scriptures, listen intently to teachers representing any of the positions as long as they do not teach from envy or strife (1 Timothy 6:4, Philippians 1:15), and test our views making more sure the word of the Lord… and, especially as Paul and the Lord Jesus Himself said, that we are counted worthy to stand before the Lord, whether triumphant in heaven or valiant in the midst of persecution here on earth.  For in either case, the Lord Jesus will be with us and we will be with Him.  And, whether because of the refinement from earthly persecution or the glorification which comes as part of the heavenly parousia, the debate will be over–we will be together and living harmoniously in the knowledge of the truth.


    [1] There are those who believe the “Day of the Lord” (which most all scholars associate with the wrath of God and the Day of Judgment) is a literal 24-hour day.  I do not hold to that point of view.

    [2]  Craig S. Keener, The IVP Bible Background Commentary–New Testament, Downers Grove, Illinois:  IVP Academic, see commentary of Revelation 3:10, pp. 736.

    [3] Ibid., p. 235.

    If you enjoyed this article, you may enjoy Doug Woodward’s ” Lying Wonders of the Red Planet” offered FREE with a one – year Subscription to Prophecy in the News magazine.


President Obama’s Birth Certificate

 “Birthers” have been painted by our intelligentsia as zealous fools, no brighter than members of the flat earth society.  But, the evidence is the gift that keeps on giving.  The following is solid proof that President Obama’s birth certificate was fabricated.  Oh where oh where is justice?


FOUR Simple questions


…are there ANY logical answers ?


You be the judge……


Here’s what I would like to know. If the TRUTH ever comes out and it is decided that Obama was never eligible to be president, what happens to all the laws he signed into being and all the executive orders?

Should they all be null and void?


These simple questions from a reputable attorney…This really should get your “gray matter” to churning, even if you are an Obama fan.


For all you “anti-Fox News” folks, none of this information came from
Fox. All of it can be verified from legitimate sources (Wikipedia, the Kapiolani hospital website itself, and a good history book, as noted herein). It is very easy for someone to check out.


1. Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes’. So how can the Obama ‘birth certificate’ state he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even used at that time ?


2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961 and Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father.
No big deal, Right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya, East Africa”.


This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s
birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet Exist ?


Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate”. (check it below)


3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”.


This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity
Home”, respectively.


The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961
if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?




( )


Why hasn’t this been discussed in the major media?


4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama’s book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I’m not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama’s “birth certificate” says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father’s date of birth approximately 1936 – if my math holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn’t been altered to satisfy the author’s goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and1945.

Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn’t have been more than 9 years old.

Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes ?


Very truly yours,


Attorney at Law
354 Eisenhower Parkway
Livingston, NJ 07039


“A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than a gun in the hands of 200 million law-abiding citizens.


Send this to as many Patriots as you can!  Ask your Republican friends /representatives in Washington D.C. If they have a backbone … Why in the hell can’t
they use it and get media coverage to explode this across our country?
Impeachment in itself is not justice!  We are talking orange jumpsuit & long prison sentences.










Do You Have That Joy Joy Joy Joy, Down In Your Heart?

The following You Tube represents a typical trip to Burger King or Wendy’s by one of our church members.  She is also one of the finest pianists I have ever put an ear to.  What a witness!  If the entire professing body of Christ boldly and lovingly shared their joy, just think of the impact we would have!  She also shares her joyful witness with followers of radical Islam without fear.  Thank you Diana, for walking with the Holy Spirit and revealing the joy of the Lord.   What else is there to say?


Cheerleader For Jesus

How Left Wing Media Spin Works…

“The goal of the liberal media is to misinform the uninformed.”  Pastor Steve

The following is an example:

Trump: “I want to secure the border and follow immigration laws.”

Media response: Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, bigot, fascist.

Trump: “I want to make good trade deals to bring jobs back to America.”

Media response: Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, bigot, fascist.

Trump: “I want to make America Great Again.”

Media response: Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, bigot, fascist.

Trump:  “We need to screen immigrants and keep out proponents of Sharia Law and Jihad.”

Media response: Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, bigot, fascist.



Another Illustration:  Donald Trump was just given a hard time by of the media for suggesting that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton created Isis.  A 2012 Pentagon report stated four years ago, that if Isis was not contained, a Caliphate could be the result!  It seems to me, that Donald J. Trump is the lone sentinel who has the courage to report the facts.  It also appears that this administration has deliberately lied to the American public about the strength of Isis.  They lied and said Isis was weaker than it really is.  The administration also lied about Benghazi, stating it was the result of a film that disparaged Mohammed, rather than the terrorist attack that it truly was.    

Examples of media lies and distortions are found everywhere.  For instance, President Obama gives us spin figures on the economy, employment, etc.  Obama offers distorted statistics in his favor while our country is in reality, much worse off.  The government rates unemployment from 4.5 to 5.0%  My friends, relatives and I laugh at this statistic as we look in our neighborhoods and compare notes.  In reality, 10-15% of our populace are unemployed.  The actual facts are there are an additional 14 million people unemployed since Obama took office, and 12 million more people are on food stamps.  Today’s left wing, liberal media are spin doctors, and they offer lies, partial truths, distortions and comfort food to the uninformed.  Only 6% of Americans trust the media.

The mindset of those who drink the Kool Aid of our left wing government can be summed up in one word – sheeple.  They are often amoral, have no faithful convictions, and are totally uninformed.  We live among a generation who are a feckless people without a moral compass.  This is what happens, as our forefathers warned us, when our Judaeo Christian foundation erodes.   Do not blame our nefarious leadership for our situation.  They can only enter a spiritual vacuum – which we have provided for them.  The masses, without discernment, actually desire them and elect them to public office!




informal derogatory

 people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led.

“by the time the sheeple wake up and try to change things, it will be too late”


Sheeple (a portmanteau of “sheep” and “people”) is a derogatory term that highlights the passive herd behavior of people easily controlled by a governing power which likens them to sheep, a herd animal that is easily led about. The term is used to describe those who voluntarily acquiesce to a suggestion without critical analysis or research in large part because the majority of others possess a similar mindset.[1] Word Spy defines it as “people who are meek, easily persuaded, and tend to follow the crowd (sheep + people).”[2]

While its origins are unclear, the word was used by W. R. Anderson in his column Round About Radio, published in London 1945, where he wrote:

“The simple truth is that you can get away with anything, in government. That covers almost all the evils of the time. Once in, nobody, apparently, can turn you out. The People, as ever (I spell it ‘Sheeple’), will stand anything.[3

Pray For Revival In America!