Comparing Charles Haddon Spurgeon To Rick Warren Is Like Comparing Elijah To Ahab!

You Will Never See Me Again, This Fight is Killing Me

May 18, 2023

By Publisher

by Jeremiah Cry Ministries

…The Above quote was written to a friend by Charles Spurgeon in the midst of what was called the downgrade. For nearly 40 years, Spurgeon had preached the gospel in London. 

It all came to a head when Spurgeon withdrew his membership from the Baptist Union. Spurgeon lamented the absence of a confession of faith keeping Baptists from drifting away from evangelical doctrines. He feared the downgrading of theology would produce an “emptying of chapels, and the multiplication of spiders” (Autobiography 4:254).

The betrayal of friends and those in whom Spurgeon trusted simply abandoned the truth, and in essence abandoned Christ. Even Spurgeon’s own brother James would be numbered with those who would forsake him and follow after the inventions of men and the gospel cheaters of his day. On April 23 James Spurgeon, his own brother seconded the vote to censure him. Spurgeon writes, ““I feel heart-broken. Certainly he has done the very opposite of what I should have done. Yet he is not to be blamed, for he followed his best judgment” (Fullerton, C. H. Spurgeon, p. 313-14).

Spurgeon writes, In place of gospel preaching, this “new-and-improved” variety of Christianity was substituting amusements. Spurgeon warned that many were turning the church into a “play-house,” allowing the values and techniques of the theater to invade the sanctuary of the Lord.

If you appreciate our work, you can enjoy ad-free articles, exclusive content, and access to our podcast archive by becoming a member. ►  Join Now

Years ago, when Rick Warren’s book The Purpose Drive Church hit the bookstores pastors and Christians alike went crazy! Within its pages was the keys to a successful prosperous church! It’s major emphasis was on church growth. The plan was purely pragmatic. The solution was to invade the American landscape and find out what people wanted and then provide the means. The results were astonishing to say the least. Churches were starting to fill up, but the numbers were not from those who were interested in the truth of God’s Word, but rather for amusement and entertainment. Yes, the numbers soared, but so did the problems. The churches were being filled with the world because the church was behaving just like the world!

Rick Warren is by far one of the greatest apostates of our day. And to top it all off, two days ago Rick Warren was appointed first-ever chancellor of Spurgeon’s College in London. What a travesty! Warren writes, ” “I am delighted to have officially joined Spurgeon’s College as its first chancellor at this important time in its development and mission,” said Warren. “I have a deep, personal family connection over four generations to Charles Spurgeon and the ministry of the College he founded, and he is responsible for my family moving to America. 

This is nothing more than a gross display of how bad things have become on the Western front. It breaks my heart to see such a mockery of Spurgeon’s college. Spurgeon would have never allowed such a villain within miles of his college. The audacity of Warren to actually accept this title even makes it hurt worse. 

What message would Spurgeon give us today after seeing such buffoonery as this? 

I believe Spurgeon would tell us to press on, and preach on. But I do believe he would tell us to expose, confront and tear down the idols and high places of this “circus-driven” madness as we have seen displayed here in our day. Warren thinks himself pretty special right now, but there will come a day when his ivory tower will come crashing down.

Soon enough…

No King but Christ!

Subscribe

Big Tech is cracking down on conservative blogs like ours. To make sure you continue to access our work, please subscribe to our newsletter.

Five Ways to Identify a Gospel-Compromising Woke Church

In an era of swirling cultural currents and shifting societal sands, the faithful are urged to stay vigilant. The temptation to forsake the timeless message of the gospel for fleeting trends is ever-present, and one such movement, laden with anti-gospel and anti-Christian undertones, has been gaining traction. Dubbed the “woke” church, this movement poses a threat to the purity of biblical teaching. Those who wish to preserve the sanctity of their congregations must be on guard and learn to recognize the markers of this insidious trend.

The woke church movement and its numerous figureheads—whether it be David Platt, Matt Chandler, Beth Moore, or some obscure progressive preacher you’ve never heard of—often resort to guilt tactics to manipulate their congregants. By insinuating that those who resist their social justice narrative are complicit in perpetuating oppression and inequality, they create a culture of conformity within the congregation. Accusations of being “racist,” “sexist,” “misogynist,” or “homophobic” are intended to silence dissent and shame believers into adopting the woke agenda.

Faithful believers must remain discerning and steadfast in their commitment to biblical truth as they navigate the treacherous waters of today’s ever-changing cultural landscape. By intertwining their understanding of God’s Word with a focus on the eternal hope and unchanging message of Jesus Christ, they can guard their hearts and minds against the corrupting influence of this heresy. Recognizing the markers of this insidious trend is essential for preserving the sanctity of the congregation and standing firm in the gospel’s timeless message. While there are many more, here are five things to look for in these churches and their leaders.

Language

Firstly, pay close attention to the language employed from the pulpit. Woke churches often adopt a lexicon laden with terms like “intersectionality,” “systemic oppression,” and “white privilege,” which can be traced back to Marxist ideologies. While these terms may appear innocuous at first glance to the undiscerning, in reality, they are Trojan horses for introducing divisive, subversive ideas into the church. For instance, a sermon may prioritize dismantling patriarchal structures, subtly discrediting the biblical concept of male spiritual leadership, rather than extolling the virtues of humility and servanthood exemplified by Jesus. Or, a pastor might address topics like microaggressions and cultural appropriation, steering the congregation away from the weightier matters of faith, hope, and salvation.

Other phrases you may hear in a woke church include “social constructs,” “toxic masculinity,” and “implicit bias.” Although these ideas may seem relevant to current cultural conversations, their origins in Marxist thought make them ill-suited for being embraced by Christianity. Even the use of such terminology often leads to congregants feeling overwhelmed by an ever-growing list of sociopolitical concerns, rather than being uplifted by the life-giving message of redemption through Christ’s sacrifice.

Ultimately, while it is true that injustice exists in this world, the focus of biblical teaching should be on the regenerating power of the gospel and the grace of Christ on the cross for all believers. The good news of Jesus Christ and his unyielding mercy for His sheep ought to take center stage in the church, eclipsing any sociopolitical buzzwords that may harbor ill intentions. By placing the teachings of Christ above all else, believers can foster unity and genuine compassion for one another, instead of unwittingly succumbing to the subtle influence of these ungodly political and social ideologies.

The Authority of the Word of God

Secondly, observe the church’s approach to the authority of Scripture. A hallmark of the woke church is its propensity to cherry-pick verses or interpret them in ways that align with a predetermined sociopolitical agenda. When Scripture is twisted or contorted to fit a narrative that prioritizes worldly issues over divine truth, the congregation is led astray. For instance, a woke church might emphasize passages like Luke 4:18-19, which describes Jesus’ proclamation of freedom for the oppressed, while ignoring the true context of this passage in its historical setting and neglecting the broader context of his mission to save souls through his redemptive work on the cross.

Another example could be the selective use of Paul’s exhortation in Galatians 3:28, where he states that there is neither Jew nor Gentile, slave nor free, male nor female, for all are one in Christ Jesus. In the hands of a woke church, this passage may be employed to promote a radical egalitarianism that undermines biblical teachings on the distinct roles and responsibilities of men and women, as well as the importance of respecting authority structures ordained by God.

These churches may also reinterpret passages like Matthew 25:31-46, which recounts Jesus’ parable of the sheep and the goats, to advance a social justice agenda at the expense of a proper understanding of the gospel. By focusing solely on the aspect of caring for the poor and marginalized, the woke church may sidestep the essential call to personal repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as the means of attaining eternal life.

And arguably one of the most misused passages in the Scripture by church leaders with a social agenda, the story of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37) might be manipulated to advocate for open borders and unrestricted immigration, disregarding the wisdom of maintaining national security and the biblical call for obedience to civil authorities (Romans 13:1-7).

Ultimately, the authority of Scripture must be upheld and respected in its entirety, not distorted to accommodate a particular sociopolitical agenda. When believers stand firmly on the inerrancy and sufficiency of God’s Word, they guard against the subtle snares of deception that can lead the congregation away from the truth of the gospel and the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit.

Sin and Repentance

Thirdly, scrutinize the church’s teaching on sin and repentance. Woke churches are often characterized by a subtle shift in emphasis from personal sin to collective guilt. Instead of preaching the need for individual repentance and reconciliation with God through faith in Jesus Christ, these churches may lay the blame for societal ills on entire groups of people, promoting a victim mentality that absolves individuals of their responsibility to turn from sin.

For example, during the Black Lives Matter (BLM) riots, some woke churches might have focused on the historical injustices faced by marginalized communities, attributing blame to particular racial or socioeconomic groups for the unrest. By fixating on these issues, they may have overlooked the deeper spiritual maladies afflicting all of humanity – the sin and brokenness that can only be healed through the redeeming work of Christ.

Another example could involve a church sermon that highlights the concept of generational sin or curses, suggesting that certain individuals are inherently more culpable for the world’s problems due to the actions of their ancestors. This line of reasoning fosters a sense of collective guilt, which can deter people from seeking personal repentance and forgiveness in Christ.

Likewise, some woke churches may magnify the issue of income inequality, attributing the struggles of the poor to the greed and avarice of the wealthy. This narrative breeds resentment and envy, causing division and overshadowing the biblical message of contentment, stewardship, and the transformative power of God’s grace to overcome sin in every aspect of life.

In contrast, Scripture calls for each person to examine their own hearts and turn away from their sinful inclinations, embracing the saving work of Jesus Christ on the cross. By focusing on individual repentance and the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit, the church can foster a culture of grace and forgiveness, rather than perpetuating the cycle of blame and victimhood. The true remedy for society’s ills lies not in the condemnation of entire groups, but in the salvific sacrifice of Christ on the cross which brings reconciliation and healing to a lost and dying world.

Sanctity of Human Life

Fourthly, examine the church’s stance on the sanctity of human life. Woke church leaders are often more inclined to focus on social justice issues while downplaying the importance of defending the unborn, the sanctity of marriage, and biblical sexual ethics. We see this regularly with some of the progressive leaders throughout Evangelicalism, even in the Southern Baptist Convention. In their quest for societal transformation, these churches lose sight of the eternal consequences of ignoring God’s design for humanity.

One example of this is the way some will often elevate the economic condition of classes of people to the same level as the lives of the unborn, often referring to it as being “pro-life from the womb to the tomb.” This ill-intentioned platitude denigrates the pro-life movement and guilts people into accepting their social agenda. By conflating issues like poverty and socialized healthcare with the moral imperative to protect the unborn, they dilute the urgency of defending the most vulnerable among us.

Similarly, woke churches may advocate for a redefinition of marriage that strays from the biblical model of a lifelong union between one man and one woman. In their pursuit of cultural relevance, they might embrace alternative family structures that deviate from God’s design, forsaking the sacred institution that serves as a reflection of Christ’s relationship with His church.

Moreover, some woke churches might compromise on biblical sexual ethics, justifying behaviors that Scripture clearly deems immoral and fostering an environment ripe for socio-economic conditions that would lead people to compromise on the sanctity of life, to begin with. They may argue that such concessions are necessary to create an inclusive and welcoming environment, but in doing so, they prioritize the approval of the world over the convictions of faithful Christians.

In contrast, a biblically grounded church must recognize the importance of upholding God’s design for human life, marriage, and sexuality. By adhering to these principles, believers demonstrate their allegiance to the Creator, acknowledging that His ways are higher than our own. It is only through faithful submission to God and obedience to the divinely created order that true healing and sanctification can take place.

Outreach and Evangelism

Lastly, be mindful of the church’s outreach efforts. While community engagement is a laudable goal, woke churches often direct their resources toward advancing a secular agenda under the guise of fighting injustice. As believers, our primary mission is to proclaim the gospel and make disciples of all nations, not to serve as foot soldiers in a temporal crusade for social change.

For instance, a woke church might organize a protest against a perceived social injustice, devoting significant time and resources to this endeavor. While standing against injustice is a noble pursuit, when such activism supersedes the imperative to share the good news of Christ’s love and redemption, it risks leading the church astray from its core mission.

Another example could involve a woke church partnering with secular organizations that promote values or ideologies contrary to biblical teaching. In their eagerness to effect societal change, they compromise their witness by aligning with groups that undermine the gospel, and biblical values such as the sanctity of human life, the family unit, or God’s design for human sexuality.

Woke churches may also prioritize the establishment of social programs and initiatives that, while providing what may appear on the surface to be valuable assistance to those in need, ultimately neglect to address the spiritual hunger that can only be satisfied by the gospel of grace. By focusing solely on meeting physical needs, these churches miss the opportunity to share the eternal hope and spiritual sustenance found in Jesus Christ.

It is essential for churches to remain vigilant in their outreach efforts, ensuring that their primary goal is to proclaim the gospel and make disciples, as instructed by Jesus in the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19-20). While engaging with the community and addressing tangible needs can be a valuable expression of Christ’s love, it must not be allowed to overshadow the ultimate mission of the church – to bring the life-changing message of God’s grace and forgiveness to a lost and hurting world.

In navigating these treacherous waters, we must remember that our ultimate allegiance is to the Lord and His Word. By keeping our eyes fixed on the cross and our ears tuned to the voice of the Holy Spirit, we can discern between truth and deception, ensuring that our churches remain beacons of hope in a dark and desperate world.

Subscribe

Big Tech is cracking down on conservative blogs like ours. To make sure you continue to access our work, please subscribe to our newsletter.

Warren Suggests He Did Better Than Jesus, Brags He Baptized 57 Thousand People

This is the same Rick Warren who was going to bring in the “Millenium” through his World Peace Plan. The Bible tells us that Jesus Christ will bring in the Millenium at the end of the Great Tribulation period. Rick Warren’s false teachings are replete throughout this site. Now we can add to this his unbelievable hubris. Even Billy Graham said about himself: “He is not sure he ever won a soul to Christ. Billy calls all the people who came forward at his crusades, “Inquirers.” In Christ, Pastor Steve <>< Video at bottom

Upon perusing a recent discourse with the “highly-esteemed” former pastor of Saddleback Church, Rick Warren, I was struck with a sense of familiarity, as if I were listening to none other than the notorious and boastful Donald Trump himself. Though the latter is notorious for his grandiose and self-aggrandizing rhetoric, I dare say that he may have met his match in Warren, who, when queried about his tenure as a minister, launched into an excessive and prolix oration of self-praise, declaring with great bombast that “I am the only pastor that my congregation has ever known. I have administered the sacrament of baptism to a staggering 70-something percent of the church in my 43 years as pastor. I have baptized 57,000 believers. I am not aware of any other church that has accomplished such a feat. In my 43 years as pastor, we have baptized five people every day for 43 years. This is truly a phenomenon that is beyond compare.”

Warren, though, is no stranger to the art of self-aggrandizement. When faced with the potential for ex-communication from the Southern Baptist Convention during its annual convocation in 2022 for ordaining female pastors in contradiction to the denomination’s statement of faith, Warren seized the microphone and proceeded to lavish himself with grandiose praise, trumpet his own accomplishments, and implore the messengers to permit him to remain within the fold.

Among the many accolades he bestowed upon himself, was the assertion that he had trained a staggering 1.1 million pastors throughout the course of his illustrious career. I am compelled to subject this claim to rigorous scrutiny and examination in order to determine its veracity and credibility. Warren then doubled down on his delusions of grandeur later in a tweet re-iterating his accomplishments:

Further, Warren recently released a video boasting about the size of his theological library, which is apparently larger than most people’s homes, raising questions about why Warren’s theology is so poor despite having access to such a wealth of knowledge and resources. 

During the interview, Warren compares himself to Jesus suggesting that he’s responsible for adding a lot of people to the church daily. “At Saddleback, we have a very defined culture, ” Warren said in the interview.

“…I’m the only pastor our people have ever known. 70-something percent of the church, I baptized in the 43 years that I was pastor. I baptized 57,000 believers in the 43 years I’ve pastored. I don’t know any church that’s ever done that. In Acts it says, the Lord added daily to the church. That would mean 365 a year, at minimum. One a day. Well, in the 43 years I’ve pastored, we baptized five people every day for 43 years. That’s unheard of.

Saddleback Church’s New Pastor is a Rank Heretic

Saddleback Church’s New Pastor is a Rank Heretic

by Publisher | Nov 2, 2022

… But that isn’t Wood’s only heresy. Wood appears to be some kind of modified universalist who denies the necessity of repentance and faith for salvation. Much like his predecessor, Rick Warren, Wood preached a sermon recently claiming that Jesus came to eat with sinners not for the purpose of calling them to repent and believe, but in order to “show his true heart” for these people and accept them, love them, and “invite them to the party.”

“Some of the best parties are parties with a purpose, and some of the worst parties are parties where we were trying to avoid reality,” Wood said. “But what I want to tell you today is that God actually wants to invite you to a party. And from the beginning of time, God has been working to throw one massive party for humanity to experience his heart.” …

We need your support. As big tech continues its crackdown on conservative blogs, our days on these platforms are numbered. Go Ad-Free plus get Exclusive Member-Only content by subscribing to us on Substack!

Last year, Saddleback Church, a Southern Baptist megachurch formerly pastored by Rick Warren, made headlines after Warren ordained three women to the pastorate at his church. Warren justified his actions by pointing to Acts 2:17-18 which has nothing at all to do with the office or the function of a pastor or elder in a local church.

Since then, Warren retired and has been replaced by Andy Wood, former pastor of Echo Church—another Southern Baptist megachurch of a similar mind as Saddleback. Like Saddleback, Echo Church also ordained women to the pastorate and as soon as he took over the pastorate at Saddleback, he named his wife, Stacie, “teaching pastor.”

As Big Tech continues to censor conservative publications like ours, we must increasingly rely on supporters to continue our work. Much of our work, particularly as it revolves around a biblical worldview on social and cultural issues, isn’t even allowed to be shared on social media anymore. This reduces our traffic and causes us to move more of our work exclusively to Substack. Members who subscribe to us on Substack will gain exclusive access to all of our work, free of ads and other annoying pop-ups, as well as member-only access to our podcast archive and controversial moderated content. Please consider supporting us today by subscribing at:https://thedissenter.substack.com/embed

In 2019 and in 2020, both former Southern Baptist Convention presidents, Ed Litton and JD Greear made headlines after their tandem preaching sessions teaching that the Bible whispers about homosexuality. In those sermons, which Litton plagiarized from Greear, they both stated that the Bible condemns greed far more than it does homosexuality.

JD Greear praised Rick Warren and congratulated him for finishing well after he announced his retirement earlier this year. But finish well, Rick Warren did not. Rick Warren is a complete and total apostate false teacher with absolutely no qualifications to teach or preach the Scriptures.

So it should come as no surprise that his replacement will be just like him, JD Greear, and Ed Litton—particularly on homosexuality. Warren named Andy Wood, former lead pastor of Echo Church, to be his replacement. And Andy Wood, like Litton and Greear, also believes that the Scriptures whisper about homosexuality.

But that isn’t Wood’s only heresy. Wood appears to be some kind of modified universalist who denies the necessity of repentance and faith for salvation. Much like his predecessor, Rick Warren, Wood preached a sermon recently claiming that Jesus came to eat with sinners not for the purpose of calling them to repent and believe, but in order to “show his true heart” for these people and accept them, love them, and “invite them to the party.”

“Some of the best parties are parties with a purpose, and some of the worst parties are parties where we were trying to avoid reality,” Wood said. “But what I want to tell you today is that God actually wants to invite you to a party. And from the beginning of time, God has been working to throw one massive party for humanity to experience his heart.”

Wood then offered three ways that you could come to the party, none of which included repentance, faith, or the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit. The three ways included “reconsidering my understanding of God,” “re-evaluating my source of fulfillment,” and “return to my heavenly father” which included “coming to him” and “recognizing that there is love and compassion.” Not a single word about sin, repentance, faith, or being born again, which Jesus says one must do to enter the Kingdom of God.

Jesus said not once, but twice, that unless you repent, you will perish in Luke 13:2-5:

And he answered them, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans, because they suffered in this way? No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them: do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem? No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.”

The Scriptures are not ambiguous in any way—Jesus and the Apostles did not mince words when they talked about turning from sin and coming to Christ. God does not have compassion on unrepentant sin.

Andy Wood is a false teacher, a blasphemer, an idolater, and a perverter of God’s word who will happily lead multitudes straight to the pits of hell with his false teachings—and the Southern Baptist Convention seems to be on track to once again endorse him as they always have.

Is the Southern Baptist Tent Growing Too Big? Is the Denomination Opening Its Doors to Heresy?

Is the Southern Baptist Tent Growing Too Big? Is the Denomination Opening Its Doors to Heresy?
by Publisher | Oct 24, 2022

The Southern Baptist Convention is arguably the most criticized denomination in the country as it has taken a decidedly “big tent” approach to issues that it faces. Seemingly never able to fully please either its detractors or its supporters, the Southern Baptist Convention’s middle-of-the-road philosophy has the far left complaining about the idolatry of right-wing issues such as nationalism while the right complains about the liberal drift that has taken the denomination by the throat and plunged it into social, cultural, and theological liberalism.

While the denomination is led mostly by moderates who would rather not take a principled stance on any issue with conviction, has this led the Southern Baptist Convention to open its “big tent” up to rank heresy?

Historically, the Southern Baptist Convention shifted from theological liberalism in the 70s into what was known as the “conservative resurgence” in the early 80s. And while the denomination enjoyed a couple of decades of relatively strong conservatism, it was still under the clout of big-tentism that allowed it to flourish. Historically divided theological camps joined together to oppose the liberalism that took over other mainline Protestant denominations that allowed for such things as women pastors, LGBTQ acceptance, and various forms of social justice. Yet, in the last decade, the same big-tent philosophy that allowed theologically divided camps to join together in opposition to social justice has abandoned its conviction against social justice and has opened the tent up to even further aberrations from what would be considered sound orthodoxy and orthopraxy. It has become a house so divided that the only way it seems that the house will continue to stand is to remove any real convictions from among the entire denomination.

But it seems it will surely eventually fail as Jesus said in Matthew 12:25, “Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and no city or house divided against itself will stand.”

Numerous false teachings have entered the Southern Baptist Convention over the last several years—many of which could rightly be labeled heresy. While some argue that a doctrine can only be deemed heresy by a church council or that it must stray from a broadly accepted creed such as the Nicene Creed to be considered as such, it would be better to argue that heresy is actually any deviation from Scripture that leads to compromise or rebellion against God’s word. After all, we don’t have church councils today and many of the serious errors that are rampant in the professing church today did not exist during the age of councils.

Such issues would include the prevalence of women preaching in Southern Baptist churches, and the influx of Marxist ideologies such as Critical Race Theory that have shaped and perverted the social gospel that many Southern Baptists now hold to. Another serious error would be the tolerance and inclusion of homosexuality under the guise of the “celibate same-sex attracted” movement. These are issues that did not plague the church historically the way they do now and these issues lead to open rebellion against God and perversion of His doctrines.

So then why should these movements be considered heretical whereas other major differences such as mode of baptism should not be? To answer that question, one must first look at the motivation behind the teaching. What is the teaching designed to do? Baptists would agree that the Bible teaches that baptism is a command to be obeyed by believers whereas Presbyterians, for example, baptize unbelieving infants. The difference is the view of the covenants and one would have to rework their entire theological hermeneutic in order to change their perspective on baptism. But one thing is clear: the difference in teaching on the mode of baptism is not designed to lead people into rebellion against the clear teachings of God through Scripture.

To put that into practical perspective, with all else being equal, you don’t see Baptists or Presbyterians embracing theological liberalism or rebelling against their Creator because the underlying teaching of their mode of baptism opens that door for them. On the other hand, you do see denominations that embrace such errors as women preachers—which are clearly forbidden by Scripture without equivocation (1 Corinthians 14:33-351 Timothy 2:11-12)—absolutely does lead to rebellion and eventually, apostasy. This is why these teachings should be considered heresy, it is open rebellion against God.

But social heterodoxy aside, what about the doctrines of God Himself—the ones that demonstrate who God is by his attributes? What about doctrines that attack God’s central attributes? His aseity, His omnipotence, or even His omniscience? There has been a debate raging within Baptist circles in recent weeks surrounding one of the leaders of the Baptist General Convention of Texas, Leighton Flowers, whose theology has now entered the realm of heresy. To be clear, there are both traditionalists and Reformed in the Southern Baptist Convention who hold to serious errors but also many who are solid and above reproach. But Flowers has taken his anti-Calvinist views so far that it appears he has to logically conclude his views with heresy. This view would be known as Open Theism.

In a recently surfaced video clip, Leighton Flowers openly endorsed Open Theism as a valid theological view that should be accepted in the Southern Baptist Convention. And while he claims that he doesn’t actually hold to this view himself, at least for now, it is likely that he does since the denomination does actually preclude Open Theism right now. Flowers’ mission and determination to destroy Reformed theology has gone so far that his views can only consistently lead to Open Theism.

What is Open Theism? Open theists attempt to reconcile man’s free will with God’s foreknowledge by saying that God doesn’t actually know the future. And while their argument is a blatant attack against God’s omniscience, they attempt to explain that away by saying that God does know everything that is actually “knowable,” and therefore, he is still “all-knowing.” But this argument still fails because not only does it suggest that there are things that exist apart from God’s knowledge, but it also denies the clear teaching of Scripture that not only does God know all things and all things are knowable by Him, but that he also declared them (Isaiah 41:4Isaiah 46:10Proverbs 19:21, etc.).

Yet, it appears that the Southern Baptist Convention is widening its gates and expanding its tent to include such astoundingly compromised teachings within its ranks. I certainly hope that is not the case, but time will tell and the direction of the denomination appears to be geared toward keeping as many people in and paying dues as possible. And if that includes rank heretics, social justice advocates, women preachers, or whatever other aberrant theology that comes its way, it very well may see just how far it can go before the house falls apart completely.

Related

Another Church Leaves SBC, “It’s Embarrassing” to Say We’re Part of the Southern Baptist Convention

Southern Baptists Abandoning Social Justice Heresy For Heresy of Dominionism

Ex-Southern Baptist Leftists Mock Josh Buice For Pulling His Church From Southern Baptist Convention

The Dissenter is primarily supported by its readers. The best way to support us is to subscribe to our members-only site where you will receive all of our content ad-free, plus you will get member-only exclusive content. Or you can make a one-time or recurring donation using the box below.

The De-vangelism of the Southern Baptist Convention

The Insurgency News Blast

David Morrill Every week, faithful church members dutifully write checks to support the Lord’s work at their local Baptist church, and thousands of these churches turn over a percentage of this giving to the para-church cooperation known as the Southern Baptist Convention. The bulk of this funding goes to support international evangelism/church planting …

The De-vangelism of the Southern Baptist Convention

There has to be a split if this trajectory keeps up

Protestia

22 hr ago

David Morrill

Every week, faithful church members dutifully write checks to support the Lord’s work at their local Baptist church, and thousands of these churches turn over a percentage of this giving to the para-church cooperation known as the Southern Baptist Convention. The bulk of this funding goes to support international evangelism/church planting through the International Mission Board (IMB) and church planting in the United States through the North American Mission Board (NAMB), cementing the SBC’s reputation as a decidedly evangelistic organization.

It was under this missional umbrella that NAMB made a recent decision to partner with the neo-christ, ecumenical marketing campaign known as He Gets Us (HGU), a project of the 501c3 donor-advised fund Servant Foundation that promotes what they call the “real Jesus” – a “Jesus” who “accepts everyone.” While the group claims to not be “left” or “right,” a cursory examination of their website paints a radically different picture.

Rather than a Jesus who came to “seek and save the lost” (Luke 19:10) whose ambassadors implore the lost to be reconciled to God (2 Cor. 5:20) and who “go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation” (Mark 16:15), the “Jesus” that gets us is relevant and relatable, offering teaching and examples that “just might help you with your job, family, or relationship challenges, as well as issues like rejection, anxiety, depression and more.”

This devil’s bargain came to the attention of SBC pew-sitters when NAMB recently encouraged churches to join them for a webinar to learn how to join the HGU “movement,” and be included on a list of churches the campaign would refer “seekers” to upon being contacted via the campaign’s website. NAMB described the movement as “the biggest campaign to change hearts and minds about Jesus,” in the event listing for the webinar hosted by president Kevin Ezell and Wheaton College Dean and expert-on-everything-by-way-of-internet-scrubbing institutional mainstay Ed Stetzer – whose fingerprints are all over the HGU effort.

Almost immediately, conservative Christians and SBC pastors on social media began exposing that the campaign was promoting a woke, heretical Jesus that bore little if any resemblance to the true Christ. Ezell was forced to immediately backtrack from the campaign, which he called “too broad” to “directly connect with” in a hastily-penned mea culpa, adding that NAMB “will pray that the conversations begun by this campaign will lead to gospel-centered conservations (sic) and cause many to seek to learn more about Jesus.”

Michelle Lesley @MichelleDLesley

If you’re still in the SBC, this NAMB/He Gets Us thing means that you are now joined to and financially supporting a denomination that’s evangelizing lost people with heresy (and that’s not hyperbole). ANOTHER GOSPEL (Gal1:6-9).12:09 PM ∙ Oct 13, 2022115Likes11Retweets

When We Understand the Text @WWUTTcom

A lot has transpired in the last 24 hours concerning the “He Gets Us” movement. What is it and what are the problems with it? Watch this 90-second video. Shout out to @TomBuck and @JohnKaleo for their sleuthing.

10:42 PM ∙ Oct 13, 2022


119Likes42Retweets

Darrell B. Harrison @D_B_Harrison

The ‘He Gets Us’ campaign is moralistic therapeutic deism without the deism. Any “gospel” that focuses on ‘sharing Jesus’ radical love and acceptance – of everyone’ (according to the HGU website), but that doesn’t call people to repent of their sin, is not the biblical gospel.3:17 PM ∙ Oct 13, 2022443Likes81Retweets

Just a few months prior, Ed Stetzer – not one to break his streak of being on the wrong side of every issue (Wuhan lab leakCOVID-persecuted churchesfake Heaven tourism books at Lifeway), began shilling for Woke Jesus in April via his column at Churchleaders.com, in which he first destroys a strawman of what he considers most evangelicals’ brand of “sharing faith” before advocating for the focus-group-tested, HGU strategy that “break[s] the mold of what most Christians think of when they think of evangelism.”

Note: Since Stetzer has a habit of scrubbing columns and social media posts once he’s proven wrong, here’s the archived link to the above-linked column.

Stetzer reminds his readers that, rather than simply and straightforwardly proclaiming the Gospel and imploring the lost to be reconciled to God (2 Cor. 5:20), we would do well to adjust our approach in light of the negative opinions, subjective feelings, and false impressions of the lost. He claims that a straightforward offer and proclamation of God’s Truth stands in opposition to love, writing (emphasis mine), “when communicating the components of a message becomes more important than how we share, we’ve lost sight of the good news of Jesus’ life, and ultimate death, for all humanity.” This “it’s not what you said, it’s how you said it” framework stands in stark contrast to Jesus’ evangelistic commissioning to the disciples, where He instructed them simply: “Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned” (Mark 16:15-16). As Darrell Harrison aptly pointed out while discussing the HGU campaign, “The main thing Jesus ‘gets’ about all of us is that we’re sinners.”

Creating the kind of absurd, blind irony that only Ed Stetzer could pull off, he claims that a lost person may very well feel commoditized if a believer insists on “getting out [the] full presentation” of the Gospel – apparently preferring an approach that deliberately withholds parts of Jesus in order to craft a message palatable to the lost person. Stetzer misses the likelihood that the Gen-Z target (with their notable desire for authenticity) will sniff out the inauthenticity of a Christian offering a version of Jesus personally marketed to them. Then of course there’s the inconvenient fact that to maintain the lost person’s interest in “Jesus” one must avoid completing the Christological picture with inconvenient truths like repentance or the call to pick up one’s cross.

This tried-and-true sales strategy is the core of the $100 million campaign, which (consistent with its shameless salesmanship) guarantees its partner churches “success” – that is, success in generating wide gate-scale YouTube views, website visits, and placements of ad spots on Monday Night Football right next to ads for gambling, beer, and every other branded vice that might appeal to the unregenerate heart.

Yet rather than a call to repentance and trust in Christ for delivery from sin, TV viewers are comforted by the claim that Jesus was (and apparently is) just another conflicted, anxious, and troubled social justice-concerned beardbro. Whatever a lost Gen-Z heart might desire, wonder, love, or oppose – Jesus gets it. He validates it, unlike those hypocrites in the church. Neo-Christ gets you, unlike those judgy Christians who keep insisting you are a lost sinner in peril.

Stetzer is careful not to entirely dismiss the “strategy” of simply proclaiming the Gospel to the lost world (like those early church pre-literates who didn’t even have research or focus groups!), but insists that the He Gets Us strategy of moving the Jesus goalposts is simply an evangelism upgrade. Yet there stubbornly remains no biblical precedent for the soft-sell of “starting conversations” or even “sharing our faith,” only proclamation of the unadulterated Gospel call to “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand” – at any stage of personal familiarity.

The SBC has been wedded to the Church Growth, seeker-sensitive strategy of evangelism for decades – a strategy that replaces the Holy God standing in righteous judgment with Buddy Christ, and Buddy Christ would never judge a fly. Rather, he desperately wants you to be his friend. To quote pre-woke Matt Chandler, Jesus’ motivation in saving is “not so that you and him (sic) can be boys.” Buddy Christ bears little resemblance to the Holy Judge who calls on his children to “preach the gospel, and not with words of eloquent wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power” (1 Cor. 1:17).

Yet the North American Mission Board revealed the level to which the SBC downgrade has progressed in its thankfully short-lived partnership with the de-vangelistic HGU campaign. Beyond the simple continuation of its promotion of self-help guru Buddy Christ, NAMB was caught actively promoting partnership with a pro-gay, inclusivist, heretical false gospel campaign – a campaign whose falseness has been known for months. If not for an (honestly quite cursory) examination of the HGU campaign by discerning believers, Ezell and NAMB would still be encouraging SBC churches to hop aboard the inclusivist Jesus train with the United Methodists (also an active partner of the HGU campaign).

Note: As of this publishing, He Gets Us has removed the denominational logos and names seen in this article’s featured image above.

Even more troubling, Kevin Ezell apparently did at least some diligence on HGU and still yoked NAMB to the campaign, telling Stetzer in the recent webinar that he found the HGU ads to be “beautiful” and that people looking to evangelize (“share their faith” in modern lingo) are “going to love this.”

View video HERE

The president of the largest church planting network in the United States finding nothing objectionable about the heretical HGU campaign is yet another nail in the coffin of the once-conservative SBC.

Subscribe to The Insurgency News Blast

By Protestia  ·  Hundreds of paid subscribers

Don’t let Big Tech’s censorship win. Our email newsletter will send politically incorrect but truthful news directly to your email inbox Monday through Saturday.Subscribe

Like this post

Comments

TopNewCommunity

Steven Furtick’s Son’s New Rap Song Ft. Guns, Sex and Designer Clothes+ Mother EndorsesThis is basically elite megachurch culture.

PROTESTIA

FEB 25

19

Personal Update From JD Hall: For the People that Care About MeThe last two years have been very difficult for me.

PROTESTIA

MAY 31

4212

Statement on the Disqualification of JD HallPlease pray for all involved as we seek clarity and endeavor to shepherd this important ministry going forward

PROTESTIA

JUN 27

1517

See all

Ready for more?

Subscribe

The Total Collapse Of Society As It Moves Further From God

Reformation Charlotte October 5, 2022

The Total Collapse of Society as it Moves Further From God

by Publisher | Oct 5, 2022

We need your support. As big tech continues its crackdown on conservative blogs, our days on these platforms are numbered. Go Ad-Free plus get Exclusive Member-Only content by subscribing to us on Substack!

In Christian apologetics, we have a term that we use to describe how we ground our knowledge and reasoning in objective truth. That term is epistemology. Simply stated, epistemology is the study of how beliefs are justified. I don’t intend to take a deep nosedive into philosophy here, suffice it to say that as Christians, we ground our beliefs in the revelation of an all-knowing, all-sufficient, infinite God.

When God created Adam and Eve, he did not leave them to figure out the world for themselves. At least, not completely. He gave them instructions and commanded them to obey. But He didn’t just give them instructions, God also gave them the ability to understand and interpret His instructions and the language by which they communicated. Upon creation, Adam and Eve’s knowledge rested solely in the revelation of God.

It wasn’t until Adam and Eve rejected the knowledge and instruction of God—the revelation of God—that the fall happened and creation began to descend into chaos. To question, “did God really say?” began the spiral into fallacious reasoning, subjective self-centered idealism, and irrational thinking, otherwise described by Scripture as “rebellion.”

Paul demonstrates this fast decline of the world, apart from God, that rejects God’s clear revelation in Romans 1:21-22, stating “For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools…”

Throughout the Old Testament, we see descriptions of various revivals taking place where God chooses people to deliver out of chaos and back into order—but these people can only remain ordered so long as God’s hand restrains the rebellious among them. We’ve seen it mostly through God’s chosen nation of Israel, and repeatedly throughout the book of Judges, whereby God delivers a chaotic people and draws them back to Him. But we also see God move on Gentiles the way he did with Ninevah when he sent the prophet Jonah to call them to repentance.

Ultimately, the greatest move by God to bring order out of chaos was to send His Son Jesus to die for us, that those who would believe upon Him should not perish, but have eternal life. This regeneration of life also brought with it the benefits of the renewal of the mind—the mind of Christ. Romans 8:7 says that our previous mind which is set on the flesh is hostile to God and cannot please Him. A mind that is hostile to God is going to reject the revelation and knowledge of God naturally and move further and further away from Him.

Fast forward to the 21st Century, we are now witnessing a society that has rejected God to such a degree that it has embraced the most imbecilic nonsense that the world has ever presented. Today, this manifestation of chaos is demonstrated in things such as postmodernism which is the rejection of absolute truth.

Postmodernism, the rejection of absolute truth in favor of subjectivism, has fractured people’s ability to think in a straight line. Postmodernism has people thinking that they’re at an old country buffet where you can get a plate and just pick all the stuff you like even if there is a mass of contradiction on that plate. In postmodernism, there is no such thing as contradiction. In reality, God owns the buffet, the ingredients, the floor they’re standing on, the silverware they’re eating from, and the one true and living God is authorized and qualified to declare what everything on your plate is and what it’s for.

But the rejection of God leads to the rejection of absolute truth and objective reasoning and everyone just gets to define things for themselves. In a postmodern world, everyone gets to choose their own gender. They can decide what to do with their “bodies” and the body inside of them. They can choose their own morality; what’s right for me might not be right for you—sexual immorality is rampant. Teachers can indoctrinate children into an LGBTQ lifestyle against the will of their parents. Governments can steal from people with a good work ethic to pay off lazy people who vote for them.

And, sadly, the Church has bought into this postmodernism. In fact, Deconstruction is a primary doctrine of postmodernism, and many professing Christians have adopted this method of reasoning and applied it to Christianity. It is most importantly corrupting the way people see God’s word. The clear, objective meaning of the Scriptures the way the author under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit intended it no longer means what it originally meant. It can mean whatever you want it to mean to you.

The modern Marxist movement in our society which is being further spread by the unregenerate American Evangelical Church does not show any signs of slowing down. Society’s embrace of Critical Theory, essentially a critique of everything into destruction, has more people intellectually crippled than the world has ever seen. Rational linear thinking is being written off as “whiteness” and anyone who attempts to use rational thought is written off as a racist. The American Church has become so neutered by the secular dialectic that the last thing it wants is to be caught partaking in a system of “whiteness.”

Society no longer exists in a logical framework where bad arguments can be pinned down by logic and sound reasoning. The world just retorts to finger-pointing and name-calling. Rational people who are grounded in the knowledge of God are clearly becoming the minority. Even intelligent people are crippled by postmodernism and many Evangelical leaders—think Russell Moore, David French, etc.—are walking object lessons on what happens to a mind that has succumbed to it.

I fear it will not get better barring a miraculous move of God. The Scriptures describe the chaos at the end of times. 1 Timothy 3:1-5 says:

But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty. For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people.

The true and living Bride of Christ is called to be separate from these people. We are called to think rationally, having the mind and knowledge of Christ, and to destroy absurdities raised against the knowledge of Christ with sound argumentation (2 Corinthians 10:5). At this point, we have to acknowledge that the world is collapsing around us and the only sanity we’re going to have left is what we have in Christ.

Related

Ten Essential Doctrines for Biblical Apologetics

1. The faith that we are defending must begin with, and necessarily include, the triune God – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – who, as God, condescends to create and redeem.  2. God’s covenantal revelation is authoritative by virtue of what it is, and any covenantal, Christian apologetic will necessarily…

Why Apologetics Method Matters

Apologetics method is the outworking of one’s theological commitments or presuppositions. Since apologetics entails a defense of the message from God directed to human beings, it logically follows that one’s beliefs about the nature of God, the nature of God’s message, and the nature of the target audience of God’s…

The Bible as Our Apologetic

Southern Baptist Megachurch Worships to Song by Feminist LGBTQ Activist Who Dresses Her Son as a Girl

Reformation Charlotte
Southern Baptist Megachurch Worships to Song by Feminist LGBTQ Activist Who Dresses Her Son as a Girl
by Publisher | Oct 17, 2022

If it isn’t foul-mouthed bands, it’s circus performances. If it isn’t a circus performance, it’s Hollywood. What passes as “church” and “worship” these days should invoke the righteous indignation of every true believer in the world. There is no fear of God in these churches and if Jesus were physically present today, he’d most likely be flipping over tables and driving out these money changers with whips made of cords.

The great preacher Charles Spurgeon once said, “A time will come when instead of shepherds feeding the sheep, the church will have clowns entertaining the goats!” He couldn’t have been more accurate in his prediction, not because he’s a prophet, but because he had a grasp on the biblical understanding of the nature of man and the doctrine of sin.

Church by the Glades in Coral Springs, FL, made headlines in early 2020 after its pastor, David Hughes, was selected by another Florida pastor, David Uth, to speak at the 2020 Southern Baptist Convention’s annual meeting. Church by the Glades has been well known for its carnality, worldly appeal, and extravagant performances of secular dance and music including the Stormtrooper Dance, Disney Medleys, and covers of Beyonce’s Freedom. And recently, the church performed a live cover of foul-mouthed rapper, Kendrick Lamar’s N95 which contains, in the original version, dozens of swear words, blasphemies, and references objectifying women.

In this “church’s” latest episode of sensuality, the band performed a song by Adele, Rolling in the Deep. Who is Adele? Adele is an English musician whose songs have become popular in the United States.

Adele isn’t just a musician, she’s also an LGBTQ activist and a self-described feminist. In an interview with Rolling Stone, she stated, “I’m a feminist, I believe that everyone should be treated the same, including race and sexuality.” In 2016, she dedicated one of her shows to the homosexuals at the Pulse Night Club shooting in Orlando as she gets emotionally charged while praising the LGBTQIA+++ community.

Adele was also spotted in 2016 at Disneyland in Anaheim, California dressing her son up as Anna from Frozen, wearing a dress and parading him around like a girl.

But none of that deters Church by the Glades from completely immersing the congregation into the LGBTQ activist lifestyle of this woman. Why any church that fears God would want to revel in the filth of the world is beyond me—the Church is supposed to be a refuge from the world.

Here’s a clip from the performance this weekend:

Carl Jung and Churches Today

Way of Life Literature
Fundamental Baptist Information Service – fbns@wayoflife.org,
PO Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061, 866-295-4143
Unless otherwise indicated all reports are by David Cloud.

Home Store Reports Library Free eBooks Free eVideo 

Carl Jung and Churches Today

Updated
September 29, 2022

(Updated to include book/slide links.)Read on Website

 Psychologist Carl Jung (1875-1961) has had a vast influence not only on society at large but also upon churches, both liberal and evangelical. He has been openly promoted by Paul Tillich, Morton Kelsey, John Sanford, Thomas Moore, Joseph Campbell, John Spong, Richard Foster, Agnes Sanford, to name a few, and has been more subtly promoted by many others. Jung’s psychological typing, for example, provides the underpinning for the Personality Profiling part of Rick Warren’s SHAPE program, which has taken churches by a storm in the last few years. 

The following important information is from a perceptive report entitled “Carl Jung, Neo-Gnosticism, and the Meyers-Briggs Temperament Indicator (MBTI)” by Ed Hird of Canada. It is adapted from James Sundquist’s excellent book Who’s Driving the Purpose Driven Church: A Documentary on the Teachings of Rick Warren. We recommend Sundquist’s book. It will help you understand just how dangerous Rick Warren’s program is. You can also find the entire report by Hird in Sundquist’s book, of which the following is only an excerpt.

Sundquist’s books can be found HERE:

Also see the following link which has color slides to support the teaching: https://procinwarn.com/james-sundquist/
_____________
Carl Jung is described by Merill Berger, a Jungian psychologist, as “the psychologist of the 21st century” (Merill Berger and Stephen Segaller, The Wisdom of the Dreams, front cover). Dr. Satinover says, “Because of his great influence in propagating gnostic philosophy and morals in churches and synagogues, Jung deserves a closer look. The moral relativism that released upon us the sexual revolution is rooted in an outlook of which (Jung) is the most brilliant contemporary expositor” (Jeffrey Satinover, Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, 1996, p. 238). One could say without overstatement that Carl Jung is the Father of Neo-Gnosticism and the New Age Movement. That is why Satinover comments that “one of the most powerful modern forms of Gnosticism is without question Jungian psychology, both within or without the Church” (Satinover, The Empty Self, p. 27). Carl Jung “explicitly identified depth psychology, especially his own, as heir to the apostolic tradition, especially in what he considered its superior handling of the problem of evil” (Satinover, The Empty Self, p. 238). Jung claimed that “in the ancient world, the Gnostics, whose arguments were very much influenced by psychic experience, tackled the problem of evil on a broader basis than the Church Fathers” (Carl Jung, Aion, Collected Works, Vol. 9, 2, p. 10). Dr. Satinover notes, “Whatever the system, and however the different stages are purportedly marked, the ultimate aim, the innermost circle of all Gnostic systems, is a mystical vision of the union of good and evil” (Satinover, The Empty Self, p. 23).

Jung, says Satinover, “devoted most of his adult life to a study of alchemy; he also explicated both antique hermeticism and the ‘christian’ Gnostics; his earliest writings were about spiritualism…” (Satinover, The Empty Self, p. 27, f. 28). In his autobiography Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Jung claimed: “The possibility of a comparison with alchemy, and the uninterrupted intellectual chain back to Gnosticism, gave substance to my psychology” (Jung and Aniela Jaffe, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, trans. from German by Richard & Clara Winston, p. 205). Most people are not aware that Jung collected one of the largest amassing of spiritualistic writings found on the European continent (Satinover, The Empty Self, p. 28). Dr. James Hillman, the former director for the Jungian Institute in Zurich, commented, “[Jung] wrote the first introduction to Zen Buddhism, he … brought in (Greek Mythology), the gods and the goddesses, the myths … he was interested in astrology…” (The Wisdom of the Dreams: Carl Jung, a Stephen Segaller Video, Vol. 3, “A World of Dreams”).

In 1929, Jung wrote a commentary on the Secret of the Golden Flower, which he said was “not only a Taoist text concerned with Chinese Yoga, but is also an alchemical treatise” (Jung, Psychology and the East, London and New York: Ark, 1978/1986, p. 3). He comments that “… it was the text of the Golden Flower that first put me on the right track. For in medieval alchemy we have the long-sought connecting link between Gnosis [i.e. of the Gnostics] and the processes of the collective unconscious that can be observed in modern man…” (Psychology and the East, p. 6). Dr. Richard Noll comments that “the divinatory methods of the I Ching, used often by Jung in the 1920s and 1930s, were a part of the initial training program of the C.G. Jung Institute of Zurich in 1948, and its use is widely advocated today in Jungian Analytic-Training Institutes throughout the world” (Richard Noll, The Jung Cult: Origins of a Charismatic Movement, 1994, p. 333).

During the hippie movement of the 1960s, the Rock Opera Hair boldly proclaimed the alleged dawning of the Age of Aquarius. Once again Carl Jung foreshadowed this emphasis in a 1940 letter to his former assistant, Godwin Baynes: “1940 is the year when we approach the meridian of the first star in Aquarius. It is the premonitory earthquake of the New Age” (Merill Berger and Stephen Segaller, The Wisdom of the Dreams, p. 162). … In a letter written by Jung to Sigmund Freud, he said: “My evenings are taken up very largely with astrology. I made horoscopic calculations in order to find a clue to the core of psychological truth. … I dare say that we shall one day discover in astrology a good deal of knowledge which has been intuitively projected into the heavens” (Richard Webster, Why Freud Was Wrong, 1995, p. 385).

Jung’s family had occult linkage on both sides, from his paternal grandfather’s Freemasonry involvement as Grandmaster of the Swiss Lodge (Jung and Jaffe, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 232), and his maternal family’s long-term involvement with séances and ghosts. John Kerr, author of A Most Dangerous Method, comments that Jung was heavily involved for many years with his mother and two female cousins in hypnotically induced séances. Jung eventually wrote up the séances as his medical dissertation (John Kerr, A Most Dangerous Method: The Story of Jung, Freud, and Sabina Spielrein, 1993, pp. 50, 54). 

Jung acquired a spirit guide and guru named “Philemon” [who was described by Jung as “an old man with the horns of a bull … and the wings of a fisher’]. Before being Philemon, this creature appeared to Jung as “Elijah,” and then finally mutated to “Ka”, an Egyptian earth-soul that “came from below” (Satinover, The Empty Self, p. 37). (The spirit guide Philemon/Elijah later mutated into Salome, who addressed Jung in a self-directed trance vision as Christ. Jung “saw” himself assume the posture of a victim of crucifixion, with a snake coiled around him, and his face transformed into that of a lion from the Mithraic mystery religion. — C.G. Jung, Analytical Psychology, Princeton University Press, 1989, pp. 86, 98) It may be worth reflecting upon why Jung designated his Bollingen Tower as the Shrine of Philemon (Jung and Jaffe, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 223).

Carl Jung himself was the son of a Swiss Pastor caught in an intellectual faith crisis. When younger, he had a life-changing dream of a subterranean phallic god which reappeared “whenever anyone spoke too emphatically about Lord Jesus” (Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 12). … This “initiation into the realm of darkness” (Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 15) radically shaped Jung’s approach to Jesus: “Lord Jesus never became quite real for me, never quite acceptable, never quite lovable, for again and again I would think of his underground counterpart. … Lord Jesus seemed to me in some ways a god of death. … Secretly, his love and kindness, which I always heard praised, appeared doubtful to me…” (Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 13). [Note from Brother Cloud: There are other things in this section that are even more abominable but I do not want to quote them. It is enough to say that Jung was a demonically-deceived blasphemer and Christ rejecter of the highest order.]

One of Jung’s key emphases was that the “dark side” of human nature needed to be “integrated” into a single, overarching “wholeness” in order to form a less strict and difficult definition of goodness (Satinover, Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, p. 240). “For Jung”, says Satinover, “good and evil evolved into two equal, balanced, cosmic principles that belong together in one overarching synthesis. This relativization of good and evil by their reconciliation is the heart of the ancient doctrines of gnosticism, which also located spirituality, hence morality, within man himself. Hence ‘the union of opposites’” (Satinover, Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, p. 240).

Jung believed that “the Christ-symbol lacks wholeness in the modern psychological sense, since it does not include the dark side of things…” (Jung, Aion, Collected Works, p. 41). For Jung, it was regrettable that Christ in his goodness lacked a shadow side, and God the Father, who is the Light, lacked darkness (John Dourley, C.G. Jung and Paul Tillich, 1981, p. 63). He spoke of “… the incompleteness of the Christian God-image” (Jung and Jaffe, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 318). … Jung believed, “It is possible for a man to attain totality, to become whole, only with the co-operation of the spirit of darkness…” (Jung, “The Phenomenology of the Spirit in Fairy Tales,” Collected Works, 9, para. 453). ….

“Jung’s direct and indirect impact on mainstream Christianity — and thus on Western culture,” says Satinover, “has been incalculable. It is no exaggeration to say that the theological positions of most mainstream denominations in their approach to pastoral care, as well as in their doctrines and liturgy — have become more or less identical with Jung’s psychological/symbolic theology” (Satinover, Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, p. 240). 

It is not just the more “liberal” groups, however, that are embracing the Jungian/MBTI approach. In a good number of Evangelical theological colleges, the MBTI is being imposed upon the student body as a basic course requirement, despite the official Jungian stance that “the client has the choice of taking the MBTI or not. Even subtle pressure should be avoided” (Gordon Lawrence, People Types and Tiger Stripes, p. 218). …

Jung taught the now familiar inter-faith dialogue line that “both paths are right” (Dourley, C.G. Jung and Paul Tillich, p. 279). Jung spoke of Jesus, Mani, Buddha, and Lao-Tse as “pillars of the spirit”, saying, “I could give none preference over the other” (Dourley, p. 65). The English theologian Don Cupitt says that Jung pioneered the multi-faith approach now widespread in the church (The Wisdom of the Dream, p. 99). …

In light of our current Canadian controversies around “Mother Goddess” hymnbooks, it is interesting to read in the MBTI source book, Psychological Types (Carl Jung, 1921), about the “Gnostic prototype, viz, Sophia, an immensely significant symbol for the Gnosis” (Jung, Psychological Types: or the Psychological of Individuation, Princeton, 1921, 1971, p. 290). Carl Jung is indeed the Grandfather of much of our current theology….

Dr. Richard Noll holds in his book The Jung Cult that such Jungian ideas as the “collective unconscious” and the theory of the archetypes come as much from late 19th century occultism, neopaganism, and social Darwinian teaching, as they do from natural science (The Jung Cult, front cover). Jung’s post-Freudian work (after 1912), especially his theories of the collective unconscious and the archetypes, could not have been constructed, says Noll, without the works of G.R.S. Mead on Gnosticism, Hermeticism, and the Mithraic Liturgy. Starting in 1911, Jung quoted Mead, a practicing Theosophist, regularly in his works through his entire life (Noll, The Jung Cult, p. 69). Richard Webster holds that “the Unconscious is not simply an occult entity for whose real existence there is no palpable evidence. It is an illusion produced by language — a kind of intellectual hallucination” (Richard Webster, Why Freud Was Wrong, p. 250). 

Jung was a master at creating obscure, scientific-sounding concepts, usually adapted from occultic literature. Jung held that “the collective unconsciousness is the sediment of all the experience of the universe of all time, and is also the image of the universe that has been in process of formation from untold ages…” (Jung, Collected Papers on Analytical Psychology, “The Psychology of Unconscious Processes,” p. 432). … 

In words strangely reminiscent of L. Ron Hubbard’s Scientology, Jung teaches in Psychological Types (1921), “The unconscious, regarded as the historical background of the psyche, contains in a concentrated form the entire succession of engrams (imprints) which from time to time have determined the psychic structure as it now exists” (Jung, Psychological Types, p. 211). …

Jung entitled an entire section in Psychological Types — “Concerning the Brahmanic Conception of the Reconciling Symbol.” [Note from Bro. Cloud: This, of course, is Hinduism.] Jung notes: “Brahman therefore must signify the irrational union of the opposites — hence their final overcoming … These quotations show that Brahman is the reconciliation and dissolution of the opposites — hence standing beyond them as an irrational factor” (Psychological Types, pp. 245-46). Share, Print or View this report Valuable Resources
O Timothy Magazine
Sermon and Conference Audio
Conference and Preaching Video Emails are sent only to those who request to be on our mail list. If you are not on our mail list and you received this mailing it was forwarded to you by someone on our list. It did not come from Way of Life Literature Sharing Policy:  You may freely copy and share and/or use excerpts or entire report as long as you credit: David Cloud, Way of Life Literature, www.wayoflife.org. Store items have restrictions. Please read our full sharing policy here.

Distributed by Way of Life Literature’s Fundamental Baptist Information Service, a service for Fundamental Baptists and other fundamentalist, Bible-believing Christians. Established in 1974, Way of Life Literature is a fundamental Baptist preaching and publishing ministry based in Bethel Baptist Church, London, Ontario, of which Wilbert Unger is the founding Pastor. Brother Cloud lives in South Asia where he has been a church planting missionary since 1979.

OUR GOAL IN THIS PARTICULAR ASPECT OF OUR MINISTRY IS NOT DEVOTIONAL BUT IS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO ASSIST PREACHERS IN THE PROTECTION OF THE CHURCHES IN THIS APOSTATE HOUR. This material is sent only to those who opt-in to the list. To un-subscribe use the link at the very bottom of this email. To SUBSCRIBE, go to our subscription page.  TO change your email address use the links at the very bottom of this page. If you have any trouble with this, please let us know. We take up a quarterly offering to fund this ministry and those who use the materials and are blessed by them are expected to participate (Galatians 6:6) if they are able. We do not solicit funds from those who do not agree with our preaching and who are not helped by these publications.  Credit Card and PayPal OFFERINGS can be made HERE

Praise God! Rick Warren Preaches Last Sermon, But His Replacement is Even Worse

Rick Warren is a litmus test for Christianity. He omits repentance, judgment, sin, hell, and every passage on eschatology. He preaches skim milk that appeals to his fellow reprobates and the Biblically illiterate. He is the quintessential referendum upon the Laodicean church age in which we live. When God judges a nation and the church, He sends apostate pastors. Rick Warren’s positive contribution is that he was God’s tool to purge the church. Over twenty years ago I was given a copy of “The Purpose Driven Church” and I left my book marker on page 220 where he stated: “Anyone can be won to Christ, provided you find the key to their heart.” Baloney. Poppycock. Only God can save a soul and he does not even know that. If he has convoluted ideas about soteriology (salvation), how could one trust him for anything else?

In Christ, Pastor Steve <><

by Publisher | Aug 31, 2022

Rick Warren, the pastor of Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, CA, boasts one of the largest Southern Baptist churches in the nation. Rick Warren has an enormous amount of influence within Evangelicalism. Rising to stardom in the late ’90s and early 2000s with his “Purpose Driven” series of books, he set Southern Baptists and Evangelicals on an Emergent “church growth” trajectory that would infect churches across the theological spectrum.

This weekend, he preached his final sermon.

“You’re going to make me cry,” he said to the church which erupted in applause. “Have I told you lately that I love you? … You’re so tired of applauding for me, I know.”

“Well as you know, today is my last message to you as your senior pastor for 43 years,” he said. “It’s been my privilege to love you, pray for you, serve you, encourage you, stand by you…” These words, however, ring hollow as a church that boasts nearly 24 thousand members, it’s unlikely that more than a tiny fraction has ever spoken a word face to face with the man they call their shepherd.

After boasting of the “6,500 plus messages” that he’s preached over the years, he told them that for his final sermon to them, he wanted “to repeat and re-preach the very first message I preached to start this church, word for word, 43 years ago.” Of course, this was the sermon, originally preached to about 50-60 people in a local high school, that launched his career into “purpose-driven” watered-down, gospel-less ecumenical, “Chrislamic” chaos that he’s been criticized for so much over the years.

Warren’s gospel is devoid of any biblical substance; it involves no repentance and actual saving faith. Warren’s gospel teaches that salvation is the result of performing a ritualistic act. This false gospel set the stage for decades of heretical movements that came out of Rick Warren’s church.

Rick Warren’s “Purpose Driven” theology is built upon a false gospel and teaches that salvation comes through repeating prayers. “Right now, God is inviting you to live for his glory by fulfilling the purposes he made you for,” Warren writes in his Purpose Driven book.

“Real life begins by committing yourself completely to Jesus Christ. If you are not sure you have done this, all you need to do is receive and believe,” Warren continues, “Will you accept God’s offer?”

“Wherever you are reading this, I invite you to bow your head and quietly whisper the prayer that will change your eternity: ‘Jesus, I believe in you and I receive you.’ Go ahead. If you sincerely meant that prayer, congratulations! Welcome to the family of God!”

Warren also affirms the pope. Bible-believing Christians understand without controversy that the pope of the Roman Catholic Church is a deceiver, a liar, and an enemy of God. Yet, leave it to Rick Warren to sign a statement on marriage that affirmed the pope as “Holy Father.”

Last June, Warren announced, with praise from the former Southern Baptist Convention president, JD Greear, he was retiring and named Andy Wood as his successor. And Andy Wood, like Greear and his successor, Ed Litton, also apparently believes that the Scriptures whisper about homosexuality.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1532782193503834117

At the time of Warren’s retirement announcement, Wood was the pastor of Echo Church in San Jose, CA. Not only is wood the typical soft-on-sin watered-down gospel seeker-sensitive Evangelical preacher, but he also made headlines recently for his interview with befallen and disqualified pastor, Mark Driscoll.

In May, 2021, Wood invited Driscoll to a leadership conference at Echo Church where Wood said they discussed pastors learning from “mistakes.”

But another former Echo Church pastor refuted Wood, calling his apology “blatantly false” and said “I know of no one on Echo’s staff who was supportive of Wood bringing Driscoll to the leadership conference,” and that even local leaders asked him not to go through with it.

The pastor also contradicted Wood, saying that Wood is misrepresenting the purpose of the conference, that it wasn’t about “mistakes,” but about “healthy leadership,” of which Driscoll clearly is not.

The former pastor posted the following screenshot of the conference description to make his point:

Image

While it could be viewed as the mercy of God that Rick Warren is finally out of the spotlight, no longer preaching, it can also be viewed as the judgment and wrath of God against those who choose to stay at Saddleback Church and sit under the delusional teaching of Andy Wood, who will surely continue to the lead that church into further apostasy.