Month: August 2019
God, family and country are clearly not as important to Americans as they use to be
Generation Gap: New Survey Shows Completely Different Values Between Generations
God, family and country are clearly not as important to Americans as they used to be, and that has enormous implications for our future.
By Michael Snyder/Economic Collapse Blog August 28, 2019
America’s values are shifting at a pace that is unlike anything that we have ever seen before. During the 2020 election season, we are going to hear a lot about “the generation gap”, and the numbers clearly tell us that this gap is very, very real.
And as older generations of Americans slowly die off, it appears inevitable that the values that are dominant among younger generations of Americans are going to become the values of the country as a whole.
Essentially, “American values” are going to mean something completely different from what they meant to previous generations, and that should absolutely terrify all of us.
A Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey that was just released has some very revealing results. Among other things, those conducting the survey asked respondents about the importance of “patriotism” and “religion”, and the differences between the age groups were quite striking…
Among people 55 and older, for example, nearly 80% said patriotism was very important, compared with 42% of those ages 18-38–the millennial generation and older members of Gen-Z. Two-thirds of the older group cited religion as very important, compared with fewer than one-third of the younger group.
“There’s an emerging America where issues like children, religion and patriotism are far less important. And in America, it’s the emerging generation that calls the shots about where the country is headed,” said Republican pollster Bill McInturff, who conducted the survey with Democratic pollster Jeff Horwitt.
In addition, well over 50 percent of Baby Boomers rated “having children” as “very important”, while just over 30 percent of Americans under the age of 39 did.
God, family and country are clearly not as important to Americans as they used to be, and that has enormous implications for our future. When all of the age groups in the Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey are combined and the results are compared to 21 years ago, we can clearly see the seismic shift that has taken place…
Some 61% in the new survey cited patriotism as very important to them, down 9 percentage points from 1998, while 50% cited religion, down 12 points. Some 43% placed a high value on having children, down 16 points from 1998.
America also used to be a “capitalist nation” that firmly rejected socialism, but now that is rapidly changing too.
According to ABC News, a recent Gallup survey discovered that 58 percent of U.S. adults under the age of 35 believe that some version of socialism “would be good for the country”….
While more than half of Americans rejected socialism in a recent Gallup poll, 43% surveyed said some version of it would be good for the country. That sentiment was held by 58% of respondents ages 18 to 34, compared with just 36% of those 55 and older.
Whether you and I like it or not, this is the direction that our nation is heading. Given enough time, those young people would eventually be running everything.
America is clearly shifting to the left, and another survey made this even clearer. When asked to choose the best president of their lifetimes, a whopping 62 percent of American Millennials picked Barack Obama as their first or second choice…
Millennials (born 1981 to 1996) were the most likely to choose Obama, with 62 percent naming him as their first or second choice. Reagan was the top pick for Generation X (1965 to 1980), baby boomers (1946 to 1964) and the silent generation (1928 to 1945).
Unsurprisingly, party identification was very closely tied to a person’s answer. Obama was the first or second pick of 71 percent of Democrats but only 13 percent of Republicans.
Reagan was the clear favorite among Republicans with 57 percent (12 percent among Democrats). Trump was the second pick for Republicans at 40 percent. Only 3 percent of Democrats named Trump.
Of course Barack Obama remains wildly popular among young people, and so if Michelle Obama decided to run in 2020 she would have an overwhelming amount of support among younger voters.
This “generation gap” is also huge when it comes to social issues.
Today, young adults are overwhelmingly in favor of gay marriage, and at this point we have almost even reached a “tipping point” with evangelical Christians. For example, just check out the results from this very shocking survey…
Overall, white evangelical Protestants continue to stand out for their opposition to same-sex-marriage: 35% of white evangelical Protestants favor same-sex marriage, compared with a 59% majority who are opposed.
But younger white evangelicals have grown more supportive: 47% of white evangelical Millennials and Gen Xers – age cohorts born after 1964 – favor same-sex marriage, up from 29% in March 2016. Views among older white evangelicals (Boomers and Silents) have shown virtually no change over the past year (26% now, 25% then).
If we are still having a “culture war”, one side is definitely winning by a landslide.
The primary reason why all of this is happening is quite obvious. For most of our history, the United States has been an overwhelmingly Christian nation. But in recent decades that has begun to change dramatically, and the shift has been most pronounced among young adults.
According to a survey that was conducted a while back by PRRI, 39 percent of all young adults in America are now “religiously unaffiliated”, but all the way back in 1986 that number was sitting at just 10 percent…
Today, nearly four in ten (39%) young adults (ages 18-29) are religiously unaffiliated–three times the unaffiliated rate (13%) among seniors (ages 65 and older).
While previous generations were also more likely to be religiously unaffiliated in their twenties, young adults today are nearly four times as likely as young adults a generation ago to identify as religiously unaffiliated. In 1986, for example, only 10% of young adults claimed no religious affiliation.
And of course many of our “religious institutions” have also shifted dramatically to the left during that same time frame.
Ultimately, it is quite easy to see what we need to do. If we ever want to turn America back in the right direction, we need to return to the values and principles that this nation was founded upon.
But that is much easier said than done.
The sad truth is that America’s young adults have firmly rejected the values that we once held so dear. They want to take this country down an entirely different path, and given enough time they will soon have the numbers to firmly be in control.
Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=3435#lWqVQ6gZAbDKRv2c.99
Whosoever Will May Come
DAYS OF PRAISE DAYS OF PRAISE
Whosoever Will May Come
BY HENRY M. MORRIS, PH.D. | TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2019
“And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call.” (Joel 2:32)
“God is no respecter of persons” (Acts 10:34). Yet in the above “whosoever” passage of the Old Testament, it is clear that those who “call on the name of the LORD” were the same as “the remnant whom the LORD shall call.” Those who call on the Lord have first been called by the Lord. He accepts all those who call on Him from every nation, but no doubt their geographical location to a large extent determines whether they will even hear of Him, and “how then shall they call on him . . . of whom they have not heard?” (Romans 10:14).
Theologians of great intellect have wrestled with these questions for centuries without resolving them, at least to the satisfaction of those of different mental persuasion. On the practical level, however, the Holy Spirit led Peter to quote this passage in his great sermon on the Day of Pentecost: “And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved” (Acts 2:21).
Peter was speaking only to Jews, but they had assembled at Jerusalem “out of every nation under heaven” (Acts 2:5). Then Paul made it forever plain that “whosoever” applied to everyone when he also quoted Joel. “For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved” (Romans 10:12-13). The Lord Jesus Christ Himself, on the very last page of Scripture, says: “Whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely” (Revelation 22:17). So, whosoever will may come! One can contemplate later, with deep thanksgiving, the mysteries of the divine call, but first he must come, and if he so wills, he may! HMM
Days of Praise Podcast is a podcast based on the Institute for Creation Research quarterly print devotional, Days of Praise. Start your day with devotional readings written by Dr. Henry Morris, Dr. Henry Morris III, and Dr. John Morris to strengthen and encourage you in your Christian faith.
A.F. Branco Cartoon – The Wrong Track
A.F. Branco on August 13, 2019 at 7:40 am
The New Green Deal agenda is a one way ride to Socialism, communism, and then total government tyranny. Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.
Victory: Trump Gets Planned Parenthood to Defund ITSELF
Victory: Trump Gets Planned Parenthood to Defund ITSELF
by News Division · Published August 20, 2019 · Updated August 20, 2019
In a startling twist of events, after both Republicans and Democrats have failed to pull federal funding from Planned Parenthood, a slight rule change by the Trump Administration got the abortion giant to defund itself.
The Trump administration made a “gag order” rule that required Planned Parenthood and other “birth control” providers to not refer patients to abortion-related services. That was a problem for Planned Parenthood because abortion is the only reason they want mothers to walk through the door. They’re not interested in providing other kinds of “care.”
The move was, in and of itself, brilliant.
Planned Parenthood takes Title X money (federal grant) to provide non-abortion services. However, as almost everyone recognizes, Planned Parenthood is in the baby-killing game, and murdering babies is basically their own profitable business. Every service Planned Parenthood offers is somehow related to the abortion procedure. Because Planned Parenthood was forbidden by the Trump Administration rule change from referring patients to abortion services (or offering them), they were put into a position to turn down the funds that couldn’t be stopped by spineless “pro-life” legislators in Washington.
In a conference call with reporters on Monday, Planned Parenthood’s Alexis McGill Johnson announced the organization’s resignation from Title X, and forgoing all federal funding through the grant program.
Title X funds began being issued in 1970, and were soon thereafter given to organizations that provided wellness exams, STD and HIV screenings, birth control and contraceptive education. Planned Parenthood’s business is abortion, but takes Title X funds and says they’re providing the above health services when, in fact, most of their non-abortion business is merely referring to real care providers who can do something besides butcher babies. But keeping up that charade has made Planned Parenthood ineligible for federal money, as it’s impossible to trace how they’re spending Title X funds.
According to CBS News…
But in February, a 312-page filing from the Department of Health and Human Services proposed what abortion rights advocates have referred to as a “gag rule.” Under the proposal, the agency wrote that “none of the funds appropriated for Title X may be used in programs where abortion is a method of family planning.” The changes impact not just Planned Parenthood, but any clinic that supports, performs or even refers patients for abortion services.
Under the new rule, recipients of Title X funds can reference abortion as an option to pregnant women, but they are not allowed to refer them to an abortion provider.
Simply put, Planned Parenthood was forced between taking federal money for doing the job they were supposed to be doing with it all along and turning down federal money and still butchering infants.
Planned Parenthood chose to turn down taxpayer cash so they could keep taking abortion blood money.
Whether you like Trump or hate him, if there’s any humanity in you, you should be excited about this change and compliment his administration for making Planned Parenthood defund itself.
The Social Media Is Possessed By An Anti Christ Spirit ~ Here Are Yet Other Blatant Examples
YouTube Hates Christians, We Caught Them
YouTube Hates Christians, We Caught Them
Dear Reader,
Did you ever hear something that left a pit in your stomach — a really BAD sinking feeling?
Well, if what we’re about to share with you doesn’t fill you with that same sick-to-your-stomach feeling, it should.
Something happened . . .
And it’s not only terrifying — it’s inconceivable.
Two weeks ago, while the news media was busy reporting on the Trump-Cummings battle, something devious was quietly afoot. It went largely unreported in the mainstream media (of course). But . . .
Religion — specifically Christianity — was burned at the stake.
See, there’s a faith-based organization called the Mighty Oaks Foundation, which serves over 100,000 active and military veterans.
Last week, the founder and president of Mighty Oaks, U.S. Marine veteran Chad Robichaux, reported something beyond disturbing.
Mighty Oaks was flagged for promoting “unacceptable content.”
SAY WHAT?
See, YouTube blocked a Mighty Oaks ad, telling the organization, “The following keywords violate Google Ads advertising policies.” It asked them to “remove the unacceptable content to continue.”
Now are you ready for this, because it’s gonna knock your socks off.
The “unacceptable” word was “Christian.” Yes, that’s right: Christian.
Not only that . . . YouTube LIED.
Here’s how we KNOW they’re targeting Christians.
YouTube is claiming they don’t allow advertisers to target based on religion . . .
Well guess what? A funny thing happened when Robichaux plugged in another word . . .
It was the word “Muslim,” and do you know what happened?
Nothing. That’s because YouTube didn’t flag it.
This is clear and present targeting of Christians, plain and simple . . .
Just like David Horowitz reveals in his explosive new bestseller, Dark Agenda: The War to Destroy Christian America.
And boy does this eye-opening book ever lay it on the line.
(By the way, we have a FREE COPY for you. Click here.)
David Horowitz, a Jew, calls it like he sees it in his new #1 bestseller.
In fact, David, a famous thinker and New York Times bestselling author, was planning on writing a book warning of a future persecution against Christians and Jews.
But as he investigated the matter, he discovered the persecution against Christians is already here.
It started. And attacks on religious Jews, including mass killing, have already begun.
In his blockbuster new book, Horowitz details the twisted trail of lies, deceit, and disgrace that has led to a growing hatred of Christians and Jews in our country.
When you read your FREE COPY, you’ll see how far the secular left will go to push God out of America — our schools, our nation’s capital, and even our homes.
If you doubt this even one iota, simply look at some extreme Democrats and listen.
Recently, California Sen. Kamala Harris, a presidential candidate, and Sen. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii took new U.S. District Court Judge Brian Buescher to task.
Want to know why?
Because he’s CATHOLIC!
Listen, Buescher belongs to the Knights of Columbus. The women proceeded to tear apart the Knights and their opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage.
Harris and Hirono seem to suggest that a religious test should be imposed on anyone nominated to the federal bench.
Talk about a direct violation of Article VI of the Constitution!
“No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”
Our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles — and the left is ready to obliterate them. And some of these people are running for president of the United States!
This probably shouldn’t come as a shock — not if you read Dark Agenda and have been following the stunning anti-Christian, anti-Jewish crusade of crazy leftists.
Listen . . .
If you haven’t yet read it, we’re giving you a FREE copy. Claim it here.
We stockpiled Dark Agenda when it was released because after seeing what’s taking place in our country . . .
After witnessing the trashing of God and religion these past few years and, in particular, the targeting of Christians and Jews . . .
We feel compelled to share this shocking yet eye-opening bestseller with you.
Dark Agenda reveals everything about how this war started and how the left’s one true goal is to create a Godless society.
Horowitz gives you chapter and verse on who’s being targeted, where they’re being targeted, and the religious whitewashing in Washington that you had no idea was taking place —you’re not alone because most people don’t know.
Leftists are pulling this crap quietly under the radar — piece by piece, shredding God, religion, and Christianity to pieces until there’s nothing left.
This has been their plan all along. Just wait until you see where it all started.
Get your FREE COPY of Dark Agenda right here. Read it as soon as you get it.
Look, your religious freedom is at stake under these far-left wingnuts. It’s time to do something about it.
Please don’t say we didn’t warn you.
Your friends at Newsmax
P.S. Tucker Carlson is urging all of his viewers to get David Horowitz’s book. Ditto for Mike Huckabee. Listen, don’t think, “Oh, I’ll wait another day to get my FREE COPY . . . there will be plenty of copies.” We can’t guarantee we will have any more FREE BOOKS later today, tomorrow, or the next day. Dark Agenda has been flying out of here faster than we can stockpile more copies. We urge you to click here now for your FREE COPY.
You are receiving this sponsored promotion as a way to help keep Prophecy News Watch free of charge. Sponsored promotions are made available through our partners and not Prophecy News Watch directly. Please contact the sponsor with any inquiries you may have.
***************************
For a free copy of Dark Agenda, you will have to go to the Prophecy News Watch website. They do, however, charge shipping for the book.
The global internet will gradually purge all of truthful Biblical information online as we near the end of the church age. The internet has already been bought out from the United States of America. Need I say more? The handwriting is on the wall. I will heartily enjoy blogging in the public domain while I can!
Maranatha, Pastor Steve <><
***************************
The Censorship Of Alternative Media Is Virtual Book Burning
Some of the ways our virtual books are being burned are deplatforming (when people can no longer publicly express their opinions) and being hidden by search engines (when readers can no longer find the information).
ARTICLE
The Censorship Of Alternative Media Is Virtual Book Burning
By Daisy Luther/Organic Prepper August 23, 2019
Share this article:
Recent discussions about an executive order that would “help protect” conservatives from bias on social media have brought a bone of contention to the forefront. Are alternative and conservative media actually being censored or are non-mainstream journalists and bloggers just whining?
As the owner of a website that is demonstrably facing censorship, I can tell you that from my point of view, we Americans are currently in the midst of a virtual “book burning” akin to the ones we look back on in shame.
The history of book burning
As early as 221 BC in China, the burning of books has always foreshadowed a crackdown on dissent and information. It’s probably no surprise that Adolph Hitler ordered the burning of “subversive” books in Nazi Germany, and the McCarthy era brought public burnings of any book that could be – if one’s imagination was stretched to the absolute limit – related to communism. There are many cases of modern-day book burning, and it generally links to opposing views, either religious, social, or political.
In the past, torching texts was a tactic used by conquerors to wipe the slate of history clean. In 213 B.C., China’s Emperor Shih Huang Ti thought that if he burned all the documents in his kingdom, history would begin with him. (He went as far as burying alive those scholars who continued to teach old ideas.)
Eight centuries later, legend says, Caliph Omar burned some 200,000 objectionable books belonging to the library of Alexandria, warming the city’s baths for six months.
When the Mongols sacked Baghdad in 1258, the waters of the Tigris were said to have run black with ink from all the destroyed books.
In 1492, after the Spanish conquered Granada, the last Muslim kingdom in Western Europe, they allegedly emptied many of the city’s treasured libraries and set their contents all to flame.
Then there are those who have burned books to silence opposing views.
Catholics torched the writings of Protestant reformer Martin Luther.
The Nazis lit a towering bonfire of books by Jewish and leftist writers such as Franz Kafka, Sigmund Freud and Upton Sinclair.
And many 1950s Americans, spurred by Senator Joseph McCarthy, hunted for procommunism books to burn.
Nothing like a handy memory hole, right?
These days, as more and more people turn to the Internet for essays and news, dissenting views are more often found online than in paperback. And there are people in power who want this to stop because particularly after the last election, they’ve seen the power the Internet has to change the entire course of a country.
Big Tech and Big Media hold most of the microphones and they like it that way. They tend to be united politically and they’ve been busily working toward silencing opposing views on the Internet, branding them as “dangerous” or “ignorant.” Members of the alternative media, writers of alternative health news, and opinion bloggers are being censored at a rapid clip.
How is silencing opposing views on the Internet any different than burning a library filled with inconvenient information?
First, we need to define modern censorship.
Opposing views on the Internet can be silenced in a number of ways. Keep in mind you don’t have to like the examples I provide here. If they came for these people or websites, they can come for your favorites next until all we have left is a government-controlled media. This has happened in China and Venezuela, just to name a couple of places.
Some of the ways our virtual books are being burned are deplatforming (when people can no longer publicly express their opinions), being hidden by search engines (when readers can no longer find the information), and financial starvation (when site owners can no longer afford to keep running the website or pay writers and researchers.)
Some examples of deplatforming
The first way is called deplatforming. This means that all of the places where a person or entity was once able to be heard are taken away. Next, they attack the earning potential of websites. Soon, the sites under attack are only able to be located if you’ve bookmarked them. If they’re able to even stay in business. I wrote recently about the costs of running a website the size of mine, which is only a fraction of the cost of big sites like Infowars or Natural News.
Let’s go into more detail about deplatforming. Again, it doesn’t matter if you think these sites are the best thing since sliced bread or if you think the people running them are lunatics. Free speech doesn’t just mean the speech with which you agree.
Take Mike Adams of Natural News for example. Love him or hate him, he has a massive following of people who have found his work valuable. He has been removed from Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Because Adams has the financial means, he responded by starting his own version of YouTube for the banned and censored called Brighteon.
But even worse for Adams is the fact that he got delisted from Google. In this business, Google is just about everything. You can talk about DuckDuckGo and Bing all you want. Google is the leviathan of the industry and most readers use it. Being delisted means that even if someone searches for an article with your site name, the article will not show up in the results.
This also happened to Alex Jones and his site Infowars. He was deplatformed by Facebook, Apple, YouTube, and Spotify, all at about the same time, which certainly suggests all the Big Tech companies are in cahoots. It wasn’t long after that Jones’s days at Twitter were also over.
This has happened to quite a few other alternative media sites, as I wrote last year.
Yesterday, the alternative media purge was boldly advanced in a coordinated effort to silence people who dissent from establishment views. It’s just one more step toward a monopoly on information by those who hate freedom. At this rate, they’ll soon have unquestioned access to the minds of more than 2 billion people. And this should terrify everyone who wants to be free to question the status quo and to seek a wide range of information.
Hundreds of alternative media site administrators logged onto Facebook to discover that their accounts had been removed. Soon after, many of these sites and their writers found that their Twitter accounts had also been suspended.
Popular pages like The AntiMedia (2.1 million fans), The Free Thought Project (3.1 million fans), Press for Truth (350K fans), are just a few of the ones which were unpublished.
Another prime example of deplatforming was Sayer Ji’s newsletter service suddenly closing down his account without notice or appeal. Ji’s website, GreenMedInfo, had hundreds of thousands of subscribers when MailChimp closed them down for “anti-vaccine content.”
GreenMedInfo has used Mailchimp as an email service provider for over 10 years, with an account in good standing and excellent compliance relative to the industry statistics. They’ve charged us, on average, $3,000 a month to send out our free newsletter to a global subscriber base of over 300,000, all who voluntarily opted into our list to receive our content. Since 2007, we’ve used their service for sending out hundreds of millions of free newsletter emails to over 200 countries around the world. We have never sent content to individuals without their consent, nor without them first asking us to do so.
GreenMed Info was also banned from Pinterest.
Why don’t we have the right to get information from an expert researcher who disagrees with the status quo? Why don’t we have the right to opposing points of view on a wide variety of topics? Are we deemed too ignorant to figure out what’s fact and what’s fiction?
Do you know what they call a government that has a total lock on information the public is allowed to access?
China.
North Korea.
Pick your communist government of choice where alternative information is outlawed.
Google keeps “updating” alternative media out of business.
Google is a massive purveyor of traffic to any website. Whether you personally use Google as your search engine doesn’t matter. Billions of people do use Google. So when they type in a question looking for the answer to a question and alternative sources are five pages back, those people are unlikely to get that far and find our information.
You may or may not have heard about Google’s infamous algorithm changes. Every few months, the web search engine performs an update and sites either win or lose. Sometimes they lose big. The most recent update, nicknamed the Medic Update, is analyzed here.
In each of these examples, you have a passionate subgroup that is much more vocal online (read: linking more) than a silent majority that reflects mainstream viewpoints.
It seems that in the Medic Update Google decided they couldn’t risk passionate alternative viewpoints overwhelming the search results on sensitive YMYL topics.
The last major update was in July, which was then tweaked again in August. These updates targeted alternative health sites to “protect” people from “dangerous information.” Sites that question vaccines, pharmaceuticals as the first line for everything, or promote nutritional changes over medication got buried in the update.
Many of the alternative health sites that declined were leaders in their niche, like DrAxe, SelfHacked, Mercola, or WellnessMama. However, much of their authority came from other similar sites, and rarely did they manage to break into earning links from sites with extremely high TrustRank.
Sites that gained in the latest Google algorithm update, like Examine.com, UpToDate.com, HealthLine, MedLinePlus.gov, and Drugs.com all managed to earn a significant number of links from mainstream, high TrustRank websites.
Examine.com begs to differ with the claim that they gained.
We’re finally posting this after a recent search-engine update, but past updates weren’t any gentler. Over the past 2.5 years, Google has decreased traffic to Examine.com by roughly 90%.
Examine.com’s SEO traffic is way down.
Let’s be clear: Google owes us nothing. They are a private organization, they can do whatever they want.
And obviously I’m a little biased — I’ve been working on Examine.com for over eight years now.
But I would argue that we provide more reliable, nuanced, and honest information than anyone else out there. If Google’s goal is to organize information and help people find what they are looking for while protecting them from scammers, they should see in us an ally for many health topics.
The latest update was roughly a month ago, and it essentially wiped us out.
The “Medic Update” seemed to focus in particular on websites that provided information about vaccine choice and alternative medicine.
I personally got hit in the tweak of this algorithm change, about a month after the original, although out of more than 2000 published articles less than 5% contains alternative medical content. (This article probably isn’t going to help my case.)
This has definitely hurt. Not in just getting fewer people here, but in the pocket, too. Which leads me to the next way our virtual books are being burned.
Alternative sites are losing money hand over fist.
When Alex Jones got deplatformed, not only did he lose access to millions of followers, he lost a massive chunk of money too. First, his advertising network dropped him, then other advertisers headed for the hills, leaving him with an estimated $5 million a year in lost revenue.
And Jones is not alone. In the same article where I outlined the costs of running my website, I also explained in detail previously how websites like mine make money. When blogs and websites lose the ability to fund the expenses, at some point, they’re going to have no option but to fold.
There are multiple ways that alternative media outlets are losing money.
The Mind Unleashed, a fantastic website where I get a lot of my own news, was recently dropped without warning by their advertising network.
The AntiMedia and The Free Thought Project were both hit by the alternative media purge that I mentioned early, resulting in a loss of reach to millions of followers, which in return leads to a loss of revenue. And in this business, believe me, out of sight is out of mind. This has happened to me, too. Suddenly, with the last update, my pageviews plummeted from about 20,000 per day to 6,000 per day. When your income is dependent upon people getting to your website, that can dramatically decrease your income.
Other people have suddenly lost their merchant accounts that process credit card payments for their products, Alex Jones being one of them.
YouTube has demonetized thousands of videos and creators with alternative points of view. PayPal, GoFundMe, and Patreon have disabled the accounts of people considered to be “alt-right.”
Basically, Big Tech and Big Media can and will starve content creators out of business if they don’t like what the websites and videos have to say.
Don’t get me wrong. I find some of the points of view that have been censored to be repugnant. But free speech is free speech. If you truly believe in our First Amendment right to dissent, share our grievances, and have a free press, even abhorrent opinions are covered. While the extreme levels of this crackdown have hit more extreme websites first, never think that it won’t continue until only a homogenized and politically correct media is all we have left.
Fake News
The new catchphrase to brush of any web content you don’t like is “fake news.”
While some information out there is decidedly slanted, other information that is called “fake news” is just stuff the reader, search engine, or social media outlet doesn’t like. It has become commonplace to call any outlet with which you disagree “fake news.”
Facebook has rolled out its own Ministry of Truth a la Orwell by having their “fact-checkers” go through posts and add an article from a site they like better to inform readers about the veracity of the article. Trouble is, the fact checks come from decidedly political outlets but are presented as the unbiased truth.
Of course, if your website is branded “fake news” then you are on the road to Silenceville in any of the multitudes of ways discussed above.
So how is this like book burning?
Back to my main thesis now, this purge of alternative points of view is nothing less than virtual book burning. If content creators are discredited, financially starved, and hidden from view, we’ll soon only have one point of view available. It will be that of the people who hold all the microphones, the people who control all the platforms.
Sure, we will still have our loyal friends and readers, but we will lose the ability to reach other people. And even if those other people come looking for the information we provide, they won’t be able to find us. Libraries and libraries of alternative content will be online but the doors will be chained shut by search engines and social media outlets.
Other pieces of information – information that is critical of the government or the politically correct cause of the day – will be completely destroyed, removed from the Internet, removed from Amazon, and turned into virtual ash.
Maybe because the purveyor couldn’t afford to keep it online because he or she was starved out of business. Maybe because the decision-makers of what we’re allowed to see decided we weren’t allowed to see that.
Decisions are made based on the information available to people. When that information is limited, so too are our choices.
You may think it’s fine when it’s the work of people you consider “extreme” being burned.
A lot of people reading this probably think that I’m nuts, defending extremists and people who may not be very nice. But, if you look closely, you’ll see I’m not defending those people or their points of view. I’m defending the right to express what one believes, regardless of how heinous I may find their opinions.
We’ve all read this quote by Martin Niemöller, a prominent Lutheran pastor during the days of Nazi Germany.
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out–because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out– because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out–because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me–and there was no one left to speak for me.
The thing that many people don’t realize is that Niemöller was originally pro-Third Reich and enthusiastically embraced the teachings of Adolph Hitler. But then in 1934, he met Hitler and discovered his own telephone had been tapped by the Gestapo. He suddenly saw that he had been complicit through his support in what had become a maniacal dictatorship and ethnic cleansing and from that day forth, vehemently opposed Hitler.
You see, everything changed when he got more information.
It changed when he learned the truth about what was espoused by the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, the only news available at that time in Nazi Germany. It changed when he learned things that the government kept hidden.
Those people cheering the fall of Alex Jones, Mike Adams, the “Alt-Right,” and any other politically incorrect information will be very surprised when they are targeted next. They’ll be shocked when their writings are destroyed and their websites are hidden.
That’s how the slippery slope of censorship works. It’s fine when it happens to the crazy people or those with whom you disagree.
But it’s going to be a shock when your own books are thrown on a bonfire because the needle of what the government or Big Tech deems acceptable has moved.
Originally published at The Organic Prepper – reposted with permission.
Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=3427#8qcvbQm4B6Rovojb.99
The Resurrection Of Socialism In America
Breaking News Updates – August 22
By Dr. David Reagan/Lamb & Lion Ministries August 22, 2019
The Resurrection Of Socialism In America
Socialism always flourishes in a secular society. And the reason is simple… socialism goes hand in hand with abandoning God and worshiping the idol of an ever-growing government who providers for our every need.
The Socialist Party of America was founded in 1901. It received support from trade unionists, progressive social reformers, populist farmers, and various immigrant groups. But it never did well at the polls, particularly in presidential elections. And its staunch opposition to American involvement in World War I resulted in a large number of defections.
The best showing ever for a Socialist ticket was in 1912, when their candidate, Eugene Debs, received 901,551 total votes, or 6% of the popular vote. In 1920 Debs ran again, this time from prison, and received 913,693 votes, 3.4% of the total.
Socialism rebounded in the 1930s during the Great Depression under the leadership of Norman Thomas, but President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal policies, which introduced America to Welfare-Statism, prevented Socialism from gathering much steam. Later, the party’s opposition to American involvement in World War II cost it much of its support.
The party stopped running presidential candidates after 1956 when its nominee won fewer than 6,000 votes. The party decided, instead, to focus its efforts on educational programs. In the early 1970s the party splintered into three main groups, and the original party changed its name to Social Democrats, USA.
The Resurrection of Socialism in America
It was therefore startling to most people when Newsweek magazine proclaimed on the cover of its February 6, 2009 issue that “We Are All Socialists Now.” As proof, the magazine pointed to the fact that the U.S. government had already — under a conservative Republican administration — effectively nationalized the banking and mortgage industries.
The writer of the cover article then asserted, “Whether we want to admit it or not…the America of 2009 is moving toward a modern European state.”
How can this resurrection of Socialism be explained? It relates to the rapid secularization and paganization of American society in recent years, especially since the election of President Barack Obama in 2008.
Socialism always flourishes in a secular society. And the reason is simple. Here’s how Robert Knight of the American Civil Rights Union explained it in a recent article: “…Socialism goes hand in hand with abandoning God and worshiping the idol of an ever-growing government.”
And that’s how United States Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont, an openly avowed Socialist, won more than 12 million votes in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries — by promising that government would become the National Nanny by providing every need.
He promised free college, free health care and another $10 trillion in federal spending. When considering such reckless promises, Robert Knight asks, “What’s not to like if you view government as an ATM machine for all your needs?” Or, to put it another way, “Who needs God when government will supply everyone’s needs at someone else’s expense?”
The Competing Systems
There are really only two types of social organization — collectivism and individualism. In the 20th Century, collectivism took many forms, such as Socialism, Fascism, Nazism, Welfare Statism and Communism. The alternative system, and the only one compatible with individualism and freedom, is Capitalism.
Collectivist systems like Socialism rely on state power to forcibly redistribute wealth. These systems amount to legalized theft. C. Bradley Thompson, who is a professor at Ashland University and a staff member at the John M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs, has summarized Socialism brilliantly as a ruling system that “uses compulsion and the organized violence of the State to expropriate wealth from the producer class for its redistribution to the parasitical class.”
Defenders of Socialism always try to present themselves as compassionate people who care for the underprivileged. They characterize Capitalism as a dog-eat-dog system that produces inequities, with great disparities between the rich and the poor. Thompson responds to these arguments as follows:
Yes, there are winners and losers in Capitalism. The winners are those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal, responsible, disciplined and efficient. The losers are those who are shiftless, lazy, imprudent, extravagant, negligent, impractical and inefficient. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice.
Thompson then sums up his whole argument against Socialism by saying, “Simply put, Socialism rewards sloth and penalizes hard work, while Capitalism rewards hard work and penalizes sloth.”
The Need for Common Sense
The young people who are swarming to Senator Sanders’ support are a spiritually bankrupt generation who view government as God. They are also a greedy generation that desires “free stuff.”
And they are obviously ignorant of economics and are hard up for common sense, for one of the facts of life is that there are no free meals. Thus, if government gives you a “free” education, you will spend the rest of your life paying exorbitant, confiscatory taxes to cover the cost of that education and the “free” educations of those who follow you. I guess the problem with common sense is that it is not very common.
Considering Scripture
Some liberal Christian spokesmen have tried to defend Socialism on the grounds that the early Church in Jerusalem practiced Socialism as described in Acts 2:44-45. “And all those who had believed were together, and had all things in common; and they began selling their property and possessions and were sharing them with all, as anyone might have need.
Yes, the early Christians, who were severely persecuted, banded together in communal groups to help defend and support each other, but that is a far cry from Socialism. The key here is that they shared their goods of their own free will. No one forced them to do so.
In like manner today, I give a lot of my income to many ministries, churches and social welfare organizations that provide food, clothing and even lodging to poor people. But I do so willingly as an expression of my love of Jesus. No one forces me to do so.
Again, the Socialists utilize the power of the State to force people to give to others through policies that result in a forced redistribution of income. And that is theft, pure and simple. Their desire is to make people dependent on the State because such dependence, in turn, will provide the Socialists with ever greater power over people’s lives.
One interesting thing in this regard that I have noticed over the years is that when Socialist politicians are forced to reveal their income tax returns, they never show any significant donations to help the poor. No, these “compassionate” liberals want to help the poor with your money and mine — not theirs.
Insights About Socialism
Rupert Murdoch, the British media mogul, recently gave a speech about the virtues of Capitalism. In the process, he made a very insightful comment about Socialism:
Socialism is a form of feudalism. The Lord is the State and the Aristocracy which rises up around the State…The serfs are the same people who have always been serfs throughout history. Socialism doesn’t save anyone from working for the company store. Government just becomes the company store.
Winston Churchill always had a pithy way of presenting profound ideas in brief statements. Here’s what he had to say about Socialism as compared to Capitalism: “The inherent vice of Capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of misery.”
One blogger, who chooses to remain anonymous, has this to say about the morality of Socialism:
Socialism is immoral at its core because it requires an acceptance that the government owns you, that when the rubber hits the road, you are simply a number, and that if you are more productive than most other people, you will be replaced as a cash cow to be milked for what some group of Statists consider “The Common Good.”
History attests to the fact that people are always willing to surrender their freedoms for the promise of security.
That is exactly what Socialism does. Beware!
Originally published at Lamb & Lion Ministries – reposted with permission.
Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=3424#5HuTVcAGfcBefjOe.99
A Special Live Watch Gathering – Sheep Among Wolves
By PNW Staff August 21, 2019
ARTICLE
A Special Live Watch Gathering – Sheep Among Wolves
By PNW Staff August 21, 2019
Share this article:
The eyes of the world are on Iran. But we invite you to look more closely–beyond the headlines, and under the shadowed guise of the Iranian regime.
As you read this, something is taking place in Iran that is both historic and unprecedented.
More Iranians have come to faith in Jesus in the last twenty years than since Islam first swept through Persia with the sword of Muhammed 1,300 long and bloody years ago.
Hear directly from leaders serving at the forefront of this underground swell as the Gospel runs far and wide across the Islamic Republic of Iran and takes deep root in the hearts of disillusioned Iranian Muslims.
Hear directly from women who’ve met Jesus in chain-shattering encounters–and then led the charge to plunder every other Iranian woman from the oppression of Islam into the freedom and saving knowledge of Jesus.
Hear directly from the nameless and faceless members of the thriving Body of Jesus in Iran–all the fruit of a rapidly-reproducing discipleship movement forming the fastest-growing church in the world today.
They don’t own any buildings.
They don’t have any bank accounts. They don’t have 501c3 status or denominational affiliates.
They have the blood of the Lamb, the word of their testimony, and love for Jesus surpassing even the daily threat of almost-certain death at the hands of the Iranian regime.
And for our Iranian brothers and sisters, that’s enough.
Join the MARANATHA family for the international release of the latest FAI STUDIOS film, Sheep Among Wolves, Vol. II.
This film brings the Iranian underground directly to you, your home, your church, and your city. Hear the stories the mainstream media doesn’t have access to.
Let these testimonies encourage and confront you as they have encouraged and confronted us.
This is a precious moment in global history. We invite you to be part of it.
LIVE GLOBAL WATCH PARTY AUG. 23, 2019 7PM EST
FOLLOWED BY YOUTUBE/FACEBOOK LIVE Q&A WITH THE FILM’S PRODUCER
Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=3417#hkqSgj4jDR9saoUF.99
First Human-Monkey Chimeras Developed In China
First Human-Monkey Chimeras
Developed in China
August 9, 2019
The researchers aim to grow transplantable human organs from primate embryos.
Ken Ham, founder of Answers in Genesis and the Ark Encounter, has a special message about the following article, as he stated on his Facebook page. “Complete and utter disregard of human life on a number of levels. They’re crossing lines that I don’t believe they should cross.
First Human-Monkey Chimeras Developed in China
August 09 2019
The researchers aim to grow transplantable human organs from primate embryos.
Ken Ham, founder of Answers in Genesis and the Ark Encounter, has a special message about the following article, as he stated on his Facebook page. “Complete and utter disregard of human life on a number of levels. They’re crossing lines that I don’t believe they should cross.
But it’s what is to be expected from a secular, evolutionary worldview where man is considered no different than animals and not looked upon as what man truly is—made in God’s image (Genesis 1:27), separate to the animals, unique and special.
Now primates and humans have a common designer, but they are not closely related—in fact, they’re not related at all. God created animals according to their kinds, and he created humans as a totally separate kind, made in his image. No animal was made in God’s image.”
An international team of researchers has created embryos containing both human and monkey cells, the Spanish newspaper El País reported July 31. The controversial project was conducted in China, rather than in the US where the project leader is based, “to avoid legal issues,” according to the newspaper, and ultimately aims to grow viable organs for transplantation into humans.
Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte of the Salk Institute in San Diego is spearheading the project with scientists from his own lab and those from the Murcia Catholic University in Murcia, Spain. The team wants to develop chimeras—organisms composed of cells from two or more species—capable of growing human organs.
Similar experiments using pig or sheep embryos have faced technical challenges, likely because the animals are genetically distant from humans. Primates, being more closely related to people, may offer more promise. “The human cells did not take hold. We saw that they contributed very little [to the development of the embryo]: one human cell for every 100,000 pig cells,” Pablo Ross, a veterinary researcher at the University of California, Davis, who previously researched pig-human chimeras at Salk, tells El País.
Ross adds that he doesn’t see the utility of growing human organs in monkeys. “I always made the case that it doesn’t make sense to use a primate for that. Typically they are very small, and they take too long to develop,” he says in an interview with MIT Technology Review.
The National Institutes of Health forbids the use of federal funds to create human-monkey embryos. China, where Izpisúa Belmonte’s experiments are taking place, has no such restriction. The crux of the controversy, according to The Guardian, is that it is difficult to restrict human cell growth to just one organ of interest. Should a human-animal hybrid develop a human-like nervous system capable of consciousness, or be brought to term and display human-like behaviors, the ethical consequences could be extreme.
So far, the human-primate embryos have only been allowed to develop for a few weeks at a time, before organs have formed, according to Estrella Núñez, a biologist and administrator at the Catholic University of Murcia whose institution partially funds the research. “In no case is the gestation brought to full term,” she says in an interview with El País.
“I don’t think it is particularly concerning in terms of the ethics, because you are not taking them far enough to have a nervous system or develop in any way—it’s just really a ball of cells,” says Robin Lovell-Badge, a developmental biologist from the Francis Crick Institute in London, in an interview with The Guardian. “[But] if you allow these animals to go all the way through and be born, if you have a big contribution to the central nervous system from the human cells, then that obviously becomes a concern.”
In July, Japanese researchers—including Hiromitsu Nakauchi of the University of Tokyo and Stanford University—first received permission from the government to create human-animal embryos to be transplanted into surrogates. Japan had previously banned animal embryos containing human cells from developing beyond 14 days, let alone implanting them in a surrogate uterus. Although legal now, it remains unlikely that any of these animals will soon be brought to term as the proportion of monkey-to-human cells in the chimeras still has to be perfected, according to The Guardian.
It doesn’t make sense to bring human-animal hybrid embryos to term using evolutionarily distant species such as pigs and sheep because the human cells will be eliminated from host embryos early on, says Jun Wu, who researches human-animal chimaeras at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, in an interview with Nature last week.
“The evolutionary distance between humans and monkeys spans 30 to 40 million years, so it is unclear if this is even possible,” says Alejandro De Los Angeles of the Yale University School of Medicine, in an interview with The Guardian.
Beyond organ production, the research could address questions of evolutionary distance between species and investigate basic mechanisms in molecular biology, Ross tells MIT Technology Review. The results could also be used to develop better animal models of human disease, says Los Angeles to The Guardian.
“The ultimate goal would be to create a human organ that could be transplanted but the path is almost more interesting for today’s scientists,” says Núñez in an interview with Vice. “What we want is to make progress for the sake of people who have a disease.”
Source: TheScientist.com
By Prophecy in the News|August 9th, 2019|Tags: Bible Prophecy, Cell & Molecular Biology, Chimera, Chimerism, China, Christian News, Clinical Research, Disease & Medicine, Embryo, Hybrid, Ken Ham, Prophecy News, Prophetic News, Stem Cell
********************************
Now our brave new world is doing what the Nazis did, but with a supposedly civilized veneer. Interestingly, the ancient world in Genesis 6 presents a scenario where the “angels left ther first estate,” and entered forbidden territory. Many believe that the mythical creatures such as cyclops and minotaur are actually the result of the forbidden mixture of the Lord’s creation, paralleling the above story. Blessings, Pastor Steve <><
A Powerful Response To The Chorus Of Christian Leaders Renouncing Their Faith
Breaking News Updates – August 15, 2019
By John Cooper/Skillet August 15, 2019
A Powerful Response To The Chorus Of Christian Leaders Renouncing Their Faith
John Cooper, lead singer for the Christian band Skillet, posted a powerful response on Facebook to the growing number of Christian leaders who have renounced their faith in recent weeks. The most notable of late was Joshua Harris ( I Kissed Dating Goodbye) and
Hillsong songwriter Marty Sampson.
Cooper directly addressed the reasons given by Sampson for renouncing his Christian faith before highlighting the need for Christians to stay grounded in truth-driven faith over an emotion-driven one. Read the powerful post below:
“Ok I’m saying it. Because it’s too important not to. What is happening in Christianity? More and more of our outspoken leaders or influencers who were once ‘faces’ of the faith are falling away. And at the same time they are being very vocal and bold about it.
Shockingly they still want to influence others (for what purpose?) as they announce that they are leaving the faith. I’ll state my conclusion, then I’ll state some rebuttals to statements I’ve read by some of them.
Firstly, I never judge people outside of my faith. Even if they hate religion or Christianity. That is not my place and I have many friends who disagree with my religion and that is 100% fine with me. However, when it comes to people within my faith, there must be a measure of loyalty and friendship and accountability to each other and the Word of God.
“My conclusion for the church (all of us Christians): We must STOP making worship leaders and thought leaders or influencers or cool people or ‘relevant’ people the most influential people in Christendom. (And yes that includes people like me!)
I’ve been saying for 20 years(and seemed probably quite judgmental to some of my peers) that we are in a dangerous place when the church is looking to 20 year old worship singers as our source of truth. We now have a church culture that learns who God is from singing modern praise songs rather than from the teachings of the Word.
I’m not being rude to my worship leader friends (many who would agree with me) in saying that singers and musicians are good at communicating emotion and feeling. We create a moment and a vehicle for God to speak. However, singers are not always the best people to write solid bible truth and doctrine.
Sometimes we are too young, too ignorant of scripture, too unaware, or too unconcerned about the purity of scripture and the holiness of the God we are singing to. Have you ever considered the disrespect of singing songs to God that are untrue of His character?
“I have a few specific thoughts and rebuttals to statements made by recently disavowed church influencers… first of all, I am stunned that the seemingly most important thing for these leaders who have lost their faith is to make such a bold new stance.
Basically saying, ‘I’ve been living and preaching boldly something for 20 years and led generations of people with my teachings and now I no longer believe it..therefore I’m going to boldly and loudly tell people it was all wrong while I boldly and loudly lead people in to my next truth.’
I’m perplexed why they aren’t embarrassed? Humbled? Ashamed, fearful, confused? Why be so eager to continue leading people when you clearly don’t know where you are headed?
“My second thought is, why do people act like ‘being real’ covers a multitude of sins? As if someone is courageous simply for sharing virally every thought or dark place. That’s not courageous. It’s cavalier. Have they considered the ramifications?
As if they are the harbingers of truth, saying ‘I used to think one way and practice it and preach it, but now I’ve learned all the new truth and will start practicing and preaching it.’ So the influencers become the voice for truth in whatever stage of life and whatever evolution takes place in their thinking.
“Thirdly, there is a common thread running through these leaders/influencers that basically says that ‘no one else is talking about the REAL stuff.’ This is just flatly false. I just read today in a renown worship leader’s statement, ‘How could a God of love send people to hell? No one talks about it.’ As if he is the first person to ask this?
Brother, you are not that unique. The church has wrestled with this for 1500 years. Literally. Everybody talks about it. Children talk about it in Sunday school. There’s like a billion books written on the topic. Just because you don’t get the answer you want doesn’t mean that we are unwilling to wrestle with it. We wrestle with scripture until we are transformed by the renewing of our minds.
“And lastly, and most shocking imo, as these influencers disavow their faith, they always end their statements with their ‘new insight/new truth’ that is basically a regurgitation of Jesus’s words?! It’s truly bizarre and ironic. They’ll say ‘I’m disavowing my faith but remember, love people, be generous, forgive others.’ Ummm, why? That is actually not human nature.
No child is ever born and says ‘I just want to love others before loving myself. I want to turn the other cheek. I want to give my money away to others in need.’ Those are bible principles taught by a prophet/Priest/king of kings who wants us to live by a higher standard which is not an earthly standard, but rather the ‘Kingdom of God’ standard.
Therefore if Jesus is not the truth and if the Word of God is not absolute, then by preaching Jesus’s teachings you are endorsing the words of a madman. A lunatic who said ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father except through me.’ He also said that he was alive before Abraham, and to see him was to see God because he was one with God. So why then would a disavowed christian leader promote that ‘generosity is good’?
How would you know ‘what is good’ without Jesus’s teachings? And will your ideas of what is ‘good’ be different from year to year based on your experience, culture trends, popular opinion etc and furthermore will you continue year by year to lead others into your idea of goodness even though it is not absolute?
I’m amazed that so many Christians want the benefits of the kingdom of God, but with the caveat that they themselves will be the King.
And what we are seeing now is the result of the church raising up influencers who did not supremely value truth who have led a generation who also do not believe in the supremacy of truth. And now those disavowed leaders are proudly still leading and influencing boldly AWAY from the truth.
It is time for the church to rediscover the preeminence of the Word. And to value the teaching of the Word. We need to value truth over feeling. Truth over emotion.
“Is it any wonder that some of our disavowed Christian leaders are letting go of the absolute truth of the Bible and subsequently their lives are falling apart? Further and further they are sinking in the sea all the while shouting ‘now I’ve found the truth! Follow me!!’
Brothers and sisters in the faith all around the world, pastors, teachers, worship leaders, influencers… I implore you, please please in your search for relevancy for the gospel, let us NOT find creative ways to shape Gods word into the image of our culture by stifling inconvenient truths.
But rather let us hold on even tighter to the anchor of the living Word of God. For He changes NOT. ‘The grass withers and the flowers fade away, but the word of our God stands forever’ (Isaiah 40:8)”
Amen and amen.
John Cooper of Skillet can be followed on Facebook here.
Read more at http://prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=3406#5LBUEUg1Ohe5kAi2.99
**************************************
1 John 2:19 King James Version (KJV)
They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
Anyone who leaves the Christian faith, never really had salvation to begin with. Demas forsook the Apostle Paul for the world. Many throughout history have left the Christian faith. This is explained in the parable of the sower. Out of the four types of soil, only one produced a crop. The other three soils appeared to be good, however, time proved that they were all deficient.
Blessings, Pastor Steve <><