TWENTY-EIGHT REASONS WHY AUGUSTINE WAS NOT A SAINT

Augustine’s Carnal Weaponization of Christianity

By James Sundquist

“Augustine is so wholly within me, that if I wished to write a confession of my
faith, I could do so with all fullness and satisfaction to myself out of his writings.”
John Calvin https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.v.xxiv.html
I can certainly understand the need to teach what Augustine taught, like you would teach
what Darwin taught and what Evolution teaches, and what Karl Marx taught regarding
Socialism, but you would do so to expose and mark them, not promote them. So I
would think that Conservative Christian and Baptist seminaries and Baptist Church
denominations would be the last people on earth to promote Augustine. So I can’t help
but ask if pastors and professors ever told their members and students the rest of the
story about Augustine, in obedience to the Apostle Paul that commanded us to “expose
the deeds of darkness,” not conceal them, as follows:

  1. The Roman Catholic Church considers him one the Four Ecumenical
    Doctors and Founding Fathers of Roman Catholicism
  2. Augustine himself stated that if it were not for CATHOLICISM he would
    not have found the Gospel. He was either a Founding Father, or Collaborator,
    and/or Co-Conspirator of these Doctrine of Demons and Seducing Spirits:
  3. Allegorical (Subjective) vs. Literal (Objective) meaning of Scripture,
    particularly Creation Week in Genesis. See my article:
    Does God Expect Man to be able to Tell Time
    http://nwcreation.net/articles/theageofearth.html
    Also exposes Dr. Hugh Ross who promotes Augustine
    “It not infrequently happens that something about the earth…may be known
    with the greatest certainty by reasoning or by experience, even by one who
    is not a Christian. It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be
    avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so
    idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings,
    that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw
    how totally in error they are. In view of this and in keeping it in mind
    constantly while dealing with the book of Genesis, I have, insofar as I was
    able, explained in detail and set forth for consideration the meanings of

obscure passages, taking care not to affirm rashly some one meaning to the
prejudice of another and perhaps better explanation.” Augustine of Hippo
SOURCE: The Literal Interpretation of Genesis 1:19–20, Chapt. 19 [AD
408]
4 Defied the warning of the Apostle Peter with his private interpretation of
Scripture and subjective eisegesis: “Knowing this first, that no prophecy of
the scripture is of any private interpretation.” 2 Peter 1:20.

  1. Purgatory and Works Salvation and Sanctification, which is the Doctrine of
    Non-Justification by Faith Alone, and thereby defying Christ’s own word on the
    Cross by teaching “It is Unfinished” (but rather finished in this life and the life to
    come). Augustine could have prevented Indulgences from ever gaining traction in
    Roman Catholicism by renouncing Purgatory as a myth, so that there would never
    have been a place to spring saints from. The Apostles Paul and Peter renounced
    myths and fables, Augustine promoted them. We would all be well to take Paul
    and Peter’s advice. But what happens is a host of pastors would even say they
    oppose Augustine, yet continue to promote myriads of his teachings. The Bible
    calls this “double-minded…unstable in all their ways.” James 1:8. In modern
    vernacular we call this “waffling.” They might even agree with this list of reasons
    why Augustine was not a saint, but then claim he was “saved” (how could he be
    saved by becoming a Roman Catholic), “a good theologian” and “we are
    Augustinian?” See this article:
    Can a Roman Catholic be Saved?:
    https://carm.org/are-roman-catholics-christian.
    One Baptist pastor who taught at Baptist Seminary who said these very words also
    insisted on diminishing the Old Testament, with particular contempt for the Book
    of Numbers and Leviticus. Yet this same pastor pushes tithing from the pulpit and
    weekly cites Malachi 10:3 regarding tithing. But these books clearly spell out why
    tithing can’t be a Christian Doctrine. Had he properly taught these Books of the
    Bible, the church members would be properly equipped. Also see:
    Blasphemy of Purgatory
    http://thesewordsmin.blogspot.com/2011/10/blasphemy-of-purgatory.html
    Augustine perverted Doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement:
    “Does this mean then that his Son was already so reconciled to us that he
    was even prepared to die for us, while the Father was still so angry with us
    that unless the Son died for us he would not be reconciled to us?… Would

the Father have not spared his own Son but handed him over for us, if he
had not already been reconciled? … I observe that the Father loved us not
merely before the Son died for us, but before he founded the world…”
Augustine, xiii [of De Trinitate]
And even if one were to fully concede that Augustine published a statement that
was clear that he believed that Christ died to appease his Father’s wrath, etc.,
because he also believed in Purgatory, as did C.S. Lewis, this would nullify PSA,
because it would no longer be “it is finished” because we have to finish it in
Purgatory, at least those who couldn’t first make it to Heaven, according to this
nefarious teaching. At least C. S. Lewis was consistent re Penal Substitutionary
Atonement, because the insufficiency of the Blood of Christ in this life and the
life to come (Purgatory), so that the balance of our sentence would have to be
paid by us. Many Protestants and Evangelicals were led to convert to Roman
Catholicism because of C.S. Lewis and his writings. See these links for evidence:
Catholic Sources:
C. S. Lewis and Catholic Converts
http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/2724/cs_lewis_and_catholic
_converts.aspx
and
My Path to Rome

http://www.catholiceducation.org/en/religion-and-philosophy/apologetics/my-path-
to- rome.html

Evangelical Sources:
C. S. Lewis and Evangelicals in the Church Today
http://www.wayoflife.org/free_ebooks/downloads/CS_Lewis p.php and
The Chronicles of Narnia Wholesome Entertainment or Gateway to Paganism

I personally knew someone who attributed their conversion from being an
Evangelical to Roman Catholicism in great part to C. S. Lewis.

  1. Millennialism, Amillennialism, and Dominionism
    Augustine taught that there is no literal thousand year period reign of Christ on the
    earth when he returns, contrary to Scripture. He was originally Premillennial but
    retracted this view as being “carnal.” In fact, Augustine systematized
    Millennialism in the 4
    th
    Century.

See Leonard Verduin’s books exposing Augustine, the Father of Dominionism:
The Anatomy of a Hybrid The Reformers and Their Stepchildren
I searched for months to find books opposing Augustine’s teachings and
couldn’t find any authors except defenders of him. So I want to thank and honor
with a special thanks to Sarah Leslie, researcher and Director of:
h ttp://christianresearchnetwork.org/author/sarah-h-leslie/ for leading me to this
source. I am so glad someone in the last hundred years told the whole truth about
him!

  1. Apostolic Succession…if this is true, then signs and wonders couldn’t end or
    cease. This would nullify or make the Reformation impossible, Apostolic
    Succession is alone the domain and teaching of Roman Catholicism! As anyone
    who is canonized as a saint in Roman Catholicism must have performed two
    miracles. It takes one miracle to be beatified. But Baptists and many Conservative
    Christians believe sign gifts ended with the Apostles. So then why are there so
    many Baptists Augustinians??
  2. Replacement Theology (aka Supersessonism) In keeping with his allegorical
    systematized theology, Israel is now the Church, therefore, the Promised Land
    does not go to the Jews in his view. Michael Youssef exalts Augustine’s City of
    God as being the Church, as to a host of those embracing Replacement Theology.
    No the City of God is Jerusalem! You can’t restore what never existed! The
    Church never existed until Pentecost and once launched it will never be destroyed
    to have to be restored! The Church was never exiled by God in judgment, will not
    be brought back from captivity, as Ezekiel made crystal clear! If Augustine’s City
    of God is the Church, I would hate to think what the City of Satan is! If you reject
    the literal City of God then you have to reject the Resurrection as Eric Douma
    made clear in one of his 10 Megaton Sermon:
    The Attempt to Destroy Israel Part 1
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxF3kgIvD5g
    What just struck upon hearing Andy Wood’s sermon on Identity of Michael and
    who is the Restrainer was that if Michael is defending Israel (which he is) but If
    Israel is now the Church which Alan Kurschner, Amillennialists, Post
    Millennialists and 80+ percent of all Christian denominations believe that Israel is
    replaced by the Church then by logical deduction, then Michael is defending and
    protecting the Church throughout the Church age and in many realms up to 3/4 of
    the Tribulation.
  3. Coercive Torture and Terrorism
    Augustine weaponized Christianity and systematized and institutionalized
    torture in the Name of Jesus. His Convert-or-die Christianity paved the way for
    the Inquisition, persecution and martyrdom of the tens of millions of true saints,
    massacring the Parable of the Wheat and Tares in Matthew Chapter 13. Had
    Augustine taken the opposite stance, i.e., the biblical stance, there may not have
    been the roots planted that eventually led to the Crusaders rounding up Jews, herding
    them into synagogues, locking the doors, and burning them to the ground, and what
    the Conquistadors did in Central and South America in the 16th Century. If I were
    the Donatists, I would feel safer with Freddy Kruger, the legendary horror movie
    villain, than Augustine. But Freddy Kruger was an imaginary figure…the horrors
    toward saints at the hands of Augustine were real…a pastor from Hell….totally
    disqualified as an elder or minister of righteousness. In fact, he never met the
    biblical qualifications to be an elder in the first place. The Apostle Paul persecuted
    Christians too, but that was BEFORE he was a Christian. In his own right,
    Augustine was a terrorist, torturer, and persecutor of Christians, and planted the
    seeds and fertilizer for the infrastructure for millions of martyrs, laying the ground
    work for and supplying the blueprints to John Calvin a thousand years later and
    the Holocaust four hundred years after that. True Christians should run for their
    lives from Augustinians, certainly not make one of them their pastor. With pastors
    like this, who needs enemies? And how ironic, that Augustine taught that “wrong
    have no rights.” Therefore, since his teachings are chalked full of wrong heresies,
    he is indicted by his own testimony. He believed that coercion using “great
    violence” was biblically justified against fellow Christians…all in the name of
    love. And where in Augustine’s Confessions do you find a single confession and
    repentance for inciting and systematizing the torture of Christian saints? So
    torturing saints in Purgatory who don’t make it to Heaven, without Purgatory, is
    not enough for Augustine, he taught torturing while they were still on earth too?
    And what could top what the Catholic Church Crusades did for torture and
    Antisemitism then rounding up the Jews in Israel, herding them into synagogues,
    locking the doors, then burning them to the ground, mirrored by and forming the
    foundation, the blueprints, and justification for the Holocaust! However, I should
    clarify that Roman Catholicism believes that even you have to go to Purgatory,
    everyone that goes there would still eventually make it to Heaven. This means
    that eventually it would be empty, though it might take millions of years. But
    where is the accounting ledger in Augustine’s book of all the restitution he made
    to all of the saints he tortured and published that they should be tortured? John
    the Baptist taught the necessity of making restitution to those who were
    defrauded, and Zacchaeus even proposed increasing the amount of restitution to
    victims to four times the amount he defrauded them. So were Augustine here
    today would he make restitution to all his victims suffering from Post-Traumatic

Stress Disorder from what he did to them? Where is the “God of ALL comfort”
that Paul taught for them? How about restitution for all of the false teachings he
promulgated? To say nothing about what all of the tithing money went for to
promote a false religion.
Augustine claims to find his doctrine and justification for harassing, stalking, and
persecuting Christians from Scripture. Augustine turned the healthy tissue of
church discipline given to us in Scripture into a metastasized form of
Spiritual Melanoma Cancer. So where did the Apostle Paul ONCE
persecute, torture, believers or unbelievers in the New Testament? Where did
he once prescribe retaliation or use violence against even the Judaizers and
Pharisees, even though he was repeatedly beaten, flogged, tortured, and
imprisoned by them? The Apostle Paul ultimately twice eternally cursed and
damned them for Eternity, but did not physically abuse them in any way in
this life. But did that only once!
The death penalty was decreed for any one who practiced re-baptism…It is a fact
recognized by many recent historians, that the persecution of the Anabaptists
surpassed in severity the persecution of the early Christians by pagan Rome
(“Mennonites in Europe,” by John Horsch, p. 300). They were burned alive and
turned over to wild animals to be devoured, and in some case given a third
baptism of drowning.
Augustine In Defense of Torturing Heretics: From Conversion to Coercion
http://egregores.blogspot.com/2010/10/augustine-in-defense-of-torturing.html
Here is a video depicting Roman Catholic Torture Techniques against heretics,
originally inspired by Augustine (incredible):
Roman Catholic Satanic Torture Methods!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XI13wMpvj3s
I am utterly astonished at the number of even Conservative Christian
Denominations, pastors, professors, authors, seminaries and Christian colleges
who exalt Augustine virtually to the Stratosphere as a theologian and pastor of
pastors, particularly in America. Augustine’s persecution of Christians paved the
way and established the infrastructure for torture which was perfected by Loyola
in the Inquisition…victims ultimately in the tens of millions. King James in
England took the mantle and baton from Augustine and Loyola for the Anglican
Church, resulting in the fleeing of Puritans and Pilgrims and an avalanche of other
Christian refugees in England and the rest of Europe. And Calvin took his baton to
Geneva, Switzerland. American was founded on fleeing from terrorists that had
merged Church and State. In fact, the United States Constitution and the Bill of
Rights was created to prevent Augustine’s antithesis of Freedom of Religion. The
Bill of Rights was created to prevent Augustinian types, with a path for redress

should any control freak ever attempt or succeed in taking anyone’s freedom of
religion away or infringe these rights. And the Second Amendment with the
Right to Bear Arms was added, so that if necessary, and an Augustinian type of
terrorist comes to your house or city would be stopped in their tracks. Furthermore
Immigration Policy is designed to ban entry into the U.S., to anyone like
Augustine who promoted and terrorized Christians that did not meet his definition
of Christian or heretic:
Here are just two of the 18 restrictions which would bar Augustine even from
entry into the United States at least historically before Covid and the Border Crisis
in which up to millions of unvetted terrorists are freely allowed to cross the
border:
“have a physical or mental disorder that makes you harmful to others” and
“have committed or been convicted of a crime of ‘moral turpitude’”
SOURCE:
List of Reason/Ground of Inadmissibility for Entering the United States

https://www.immihelp.com/18-grounds-of-inadmissibility-for-entering-the-united-states/

How about inside of the United States? Augustine would be guilty of torturing by
these statutes:
Bill of Rights
It is debated as to whether or not torture as a punishment falls under the cruel and
unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States
Constitution. The text of the Amendment states that:
“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and
unusual punishments inflicted.” The U.S. Supreme Court has held since at least
the 1890s that punishments which involved torture are forbidden under the Eighth
Amendment.[4] 18 U.S.C. § 2340[edit]

An act of torture committed outside the United States by a U.S. national or a non-
U.S. national who is present in the United States is punishable under 18 U.S.C. §

  1. The definition of torture used is as follows:
    As used in this chapter—“torture” means an act committed by a person acting
    under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental
    pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon
    another person within his custody or physical control; “severe mental pain or
    suffering” means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from—the
    intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;
    the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of
    mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the

senses or the personality; the threat of imminent death; or the threat that another
person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or
the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures
calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality; and
(3) “United States” means the several states of the United States, the District of
Columbia, and the commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the United
States.
And if somehow Augustine had managed to sneak into the country as an illegal
alien, and started up the same Godfather tactics he practiced in North Africa, he
would have been rounded up and rightfully deported or tried for a host of crimes.
Fortunately, now they have stalking laws to use against 21
st
Century stalkers like
Augustine, and kidnapping. In fact, kidnapping would be a federal felony crime.
Tragically these laws are exponentially no longer being enforced. So if Augustine
were to attempt seizing someone today in the U.S., he could, or at least should be
deported, or in some cases, if death resulted in the person being tortured, it would
be Augustine himself receiving capital punishment. Were Augustine alive today,
tragically, this would be the perfect time for him to sneak across our Southern
Border. Yet pastor after pastor remains gobsmacked and delirious in their
delusion over Augustine. Augustine shouldn’t be able to even gain legitimate
entry into the United States, couldn’t become a member of a Conservative Baptist
Church, and could not become a pastor. Yet Pastor after pastor, denomination
after denomination can’t control themselves from exalting him and no doubt
couldn’t wait to install him as their pastor or head of their church denomination.
John Calvin too, took the mantle of persecuting Christians in Switzerland, from
Augustine, who were running for their lives. So thorough was Calvin’s total
submersion and baptism into Augustine, he said that his whole theology could be
found in the words of Augustine. Augustine designed the original torture of
Christians by the Catholic Church, Loyola refined it. I thought we got rid of the
Divine Right of Kings, once and for all, only to be replaced by the Divine Right of
Pastors, who want to put us back under bondage? Augustine is indisputably the
global Grand Architect, and Founding Father of Christians torturing Christians…a
gangster. Anyone in law enforcement or the FBI profiling this person, not
knowing who he was, would see a psychopath and sociopath control freak hungry
for power who could not contain himself from abusing his perceived enemies of
the church…real or imagined…until they find out it was Augustine…then
mystically he becomes a sacred cow with diplomatic immunity…and in the
church, anyone speaking ill of him is the one with the problem.

The Shepherding Movement pales in comparison, yet no doubt has its roots in
Augustine. If anyone does not believe my report, I invite you to do your own
Google search for Augustine’s own words, published in his writings and books.
Had pastors and authors on Augustine done this, they would discover they had
deceived their own sheep, in this generation, and actually preached from the pulpit
what Augustine really taught before the Internet, for sixteen hundred years,
perhaps the Great Falling Away could have at least been minimized. But now, as
the Apostle Paul would say, they are without excuse!
And in case you think control-freak Christianity is extinct in either Roman
Catholicism or Protestants, see these stories in Germany, where hundreds of
thousands of both Catholics and Protestants are either terminating their church
membership, or are leaving the country, as recent at 2015 because the national
government taxes all members:
“The German church tax — which is 8 to 9 percent of the annual income tax —
is so steep, however, that many people formally quit the church to avoid paying,
while nevertheless remaining active in their faith.”
10 Facts about German Church Tax
10 Facts about German Church Tax | myGermanExpert Blog
blexpert.com/2013/ /10-og.mygermanFacts-about-German-Church-Tax.ht
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_tax

Taxpayers, whether Roman Catholic, Protestant or members of other tax-
collecting communities, pay an amount equal to between 8% (in Bavaria and

Baden-Württemberg) and 9% (in the rest of the country) of their income tax to the
church or other community to which they belong.
Compulsory Income Tax on Christians Drives Germans Away From Protestant
and Catholic Churches
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11380968/Compul

sory-income-tax-on-Christians-drives-Germans-away-from-Protestant-and-
Catholic-churches.html

England does the same thing.

  1. Just War Antisemitism Theology led to Crusades justification for and
    Global Conspiracy to Steal the Land of Israel [the title of my documentary]
    for the Catholic Church. His vitriol toward all Jews can be captured in this quote:
    “As “Witness People”, he sanctified collective punishment for the Jewish
    deicide and enslavement of Jews to Catholics: “Not by bodily death, shall
    the ungodly race of carnal Jews perish … ‘Scatter them abroad, take away
    their strength. And bring them down O Lord.’” Also see:
    http://www.messianicassociation.org/ezine17-at.replacement-theology.htm
  2. Leaven of Herod defying warning of Christ; merging Church and State as
    well as the warning of the Apostle Paul to let punishment for church matters and
    heresy stay within the church, unless crimes have been committed, then turn that
    over to the State.
  3. Priests as Mediators between God and Man defying the Apostle Paul who
    wrote there is only One Mediator, Christ Jesus.
  4. City of God is the Church and not Jerusalem
  5. Infant Salvation Baptism and calling anyone who rejected it “infidels” and
    “cursed.” Augustine effectively called these Christians “accursed” is what the
    Apostle Paul did to the Judaizers in Galatians, so that they would have NO hope
    of salvation, eternally damning them. Augustine’s doctrine on infant baptism was
    eventually codified in the Roman Catholic Council of Trent, which
    anathematized anyone who did not hold these views on baptism. Want proof?
    Here is the Catholic Doctrine:
    “ON BAPTISM
    CANON I.-If any one saith, that the baptism of John had the same force as
    the baptism of Christ; let him be anathema.
    CANON II.-If any one saith, that true and natural water is not of necessity
    for baptism, and, on that account, wrests, to some sort of metaphor, those
    words of our Lord Jesus Christ; Unless a man be born again of water and
    the Holy Ghost; let him be anathema.
    CANON III.-If any one saith, that in the Roman church, which is the
    mother and mistress of all churches, there is not the true doctrine
    concerning the sacrament of baptism; let him be anathema.
    CANON IV.-If any one saith, that the baptism which is even given by
    heretics in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost,
    with the intention of doing what the Church doth, is not true baptism; let
    him be anathema.
    CANON V.-If any one saith, that baptism is free, that is, not necessary unto
    salvation; let him be anathema.
    CANON VI.-If any one saith, that one who has been baptized cannot, even
    if he would, lose grace, let him sin ever so much, unless he will not believe;
    let him be anathema.

CANON VII.-If any one saith, that the baptized are, by baptism itself,
made debtors but to faith alone, and not to the observance of the whole law
of Christ; let him be anathema.
CANON VIII.-If any one saith, that the baptized are freed from all the
precepts, whether written or transmitted, of holy Church, in such wise that
they are not bound to observe them, unless they have chosen of their own
accord to submit themselves thereunto; let him be anathema.
CANON IX.-If any one saith, that the resemblance of the baptism which
they have received is so to be recalled unto men, as that they are to
understand, that all vows made after baptism are void, in virtue of the
promise already made in that baptism; as if, by those vows, they both
derogated from that faith which they have professed, and from that baptism
itself; let him be anathema.
CANON X.-If any one saith, that by the sole remembrance and the faith of
the baptism which has been received, all sins committed after baptism are
either remitted, or made venial; let him be anathema.
CANON XI.-If any one saith, that baptism, which was true and rightly
conferred, is to be repeated, for him who has denied the faith of Christ
amongst Infidels, when he is converted unto penitence; let him be
anathema.
CANON XII.-If any one saith, that no one is to be baptized save at that
age at which Christ was baptized, or in the very article of death; let him
be anathema.
CANON XIII.-If any one saith, that little children, for that they have not
actual faith, are not, after having received baptism, to be reckoned amongst
the faithful; and that, for this cause, they are to be re-baptized when they
have attained to year of discretion; or, that it is better that the baptism of
such be omitted, than that, while not believing by their own act, they should
be baptized in the faith alone of the Church; let him be anathema.
CANON XIV.-If any one saith, that those who have been thus baptized
when children, are, when they have grown up, to be asked whether they will
ratify what their sponsors promised in their names when they were
baptized; and that, in case they answer that they will not, they are to be left
to their own will; and are not to be compelled meanwhile to a Christian life
by any other penalty, save that they be excluded from the participation of
the Eucharist, and of the other sacraments, until they repent; let him be
anathema.”

Even Vatican II was just as ruthless, which was supposed to be kinder and gentler:
“If anyone says that in the Roman Church, which is the mother and mistress
of all churches, there is not the true doctrine concerning the sacrament
of baptism, let him be anathema.” (ibid., p. 53 — Seventh Session,
Sacrament Of Baptism, Canon 3)
So when was this doctrine ever rescinded? Answer: NEVER! One more urgent
point regarding Eucharist, Augustine believed it is the literal body and blood of
Christ [Real Presence], and Catholic children can not take Eucharist until and
unless they were first baptized, usually as an infant, and took Confirmation. But
these vows requires that they are confirming what the Catholic Church says Infant
Baptism accomplishes which is to remove Original and Saves them. But to do this
means they are confirming two false teachings. This makes both the priest and the
partaker of this Sacrament guilty of this Scripture passage warning of the Apostle
Paul:
“Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord,
unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.” “For he that
eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself,
not discerning the Lord’s body.” I Corinthians 11: 27,29

  1. Monasticism…marriage only value is to produce celibate offspring, defying
    Scripture and paving way for pedophilia abuse and homosexuality among priests
  2. Neoplatonist (you can become perfect and happy in this life) and
    Humanist
  3. Mysticism and Gnosticism
    Augustine was not just a mystic, but is considered the Father of Mysticism in the
    both Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodox Church, which he acquired from
    the Desert Fathers in North Africa. He paved the way for Contemplative Prayer
    that invaded even Conservative Christian Denominations.
    Augustine = Contemplative Meditation = Altered State of Consciousness =
    Spiritual LSD without $ cost in this life = antithesis of Biblical Meditation, but
    Eternal Cost in the next life!
    Augustine got it all rolling in the Catholic Church, but now the plague has spilled
    into Reformation Denominations…read the fruit of this in the 21
    st
    Century:

http://www.discernment-ministries.org/

More proof, see Bob DeWaay’s:
Richard Foster—Celebration of Deception
http://cicministry.org/commentary/issue112.htm
(This article does not name Augustine, but is about Richard Foster. However,
Richard Foster says this about Augustine):
“Confessions of St. Augustine” Recommended by Richard Foster as one of
the best of the “experiential classics in Christian literature.”

  1. Transubstantiation (Catholic Doctrine that teaches the Body and Blood of
    Christ becomes literal) historically known as the Eucharist but given this
    additional title in the Roman Catholic Fourth Council of the Lateran in 1215.
  2. Necromancy: Praying to the dead and to Mary and Mary never sinned
    Necromancy is a magic art, i.e., sorcery. Revelation states clearly that those
    practice magic arts “will find their place in the Lake of Fire.” Rev. 21:8, and
    reconfirmed in Rev 22:15. So if Augustine was truly a saint, and “saved” then
    how does he find himself in the Lake of Fire by practicing and stumbling
    multitudes to do the same? Augustine was so mixed up he call Mary the spouse
    of God:
    Augustine wrongly calls Mary, ALONE, the Spouse of God. The Church is
    the Spouse, or more technically the Bride to be, she is presently betrothed to
    Christ who is the Groom. She becomes the Bride (therefore the Wife) at the
    Wedding Supper of the Lamb, when Christ returns in Glory for his Bride.
    Now Mary, though highly favored among women, is less than one-billionth of
    the Bride to be, because she is a Christian. But all born-again Christians
    make up the Bride.
    “Mary was the only one who merited to be called the Mother as Spouse of
    God.” Augustine of Hippo
    SOURCE: Augustine, Sermons 208; quoted by St. Alphonsus de Liguori in The
    Glories of Mary (New York: Redemptorist, 1931)
    But it is the Church that is the Bride of Christ the Groom, who is God. Mary was
    only a fraction of one percent of the Bride. Also a spouse must be married. The
    Church is presently betrothed to the Lord (engaged), but not married yet. That
    can’t happen until the Marriage Supper of the Lamb, when Christ returns in Glory.
    Furthermore, how could Mary be the Mother of God? Mary needed a Redeemer.
    Can someone in need of a redeemer be the Mother of God? And how can you be
    simultaneously Wife and Mother of God? Now imagine that if Mary is the Mother
    of God, wouldn’t all Christians (the Church) then be collectively the Mother of
    God, using Augustine’s logic…since after all, the Mother of God and the Spouse

(Wife) are one and the same? Mary doesn’t become the Spouse of God until all we
as Christians simultaneously become His Spouse with Mary, at the Wedding
Supper of the Lamb! Yet the legend of Augustine lives on without his deeds of
darkness and false teachings being exposed, marked, and named, as the Apostle
Paul commanded of all true Christians. The fact of this statement of Augustine,
alone, renders him Reprobate. Some might say he is apostate. But apostate means
to fall away from something that was originally a true religion or seed. But as
Christ said a thorn bush cannot produce figs. Matthew 23, though initially written
to call Judaism a worthless religion, it is mirrored in Catholicism. Catholicism,
just like Judaism in the First Century are thorn bush religions worthless (Christ
and the Apostle Paul’s words, not mine). Though I will say that Roman
Catholicism has also fallen away even further into the Abyss since Augustine.

  1. Praying for the dead
  2. Jews have the Mark of Cain
  3. Nephilim were descendants of Cain
  4. Christians must Tithe at minimum. This is extortion and defies the Council
    of Jerusalem’s ruling for minimum requirements of Gentile Christians, and the
    Apostle Paul’s own instructions that all giving must NOT be out of compulsion.
    See Dr. Russell Kelly’s film documentary entitled:
    Tithing is not a Christian Doctrine:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYFkEh5bEXw
  5. Added to God’s word importing Apocrypha to Canon
  6. Exalted Traditions of men over Traditions of Christ and His Apostles in
    Scripture as Final Authority in defiance of the Apostle Paul and John in
    Revelation
  7. Augustine, again Calvin’s foundation was virulently Antisemitic:
    “Not by bodily death, shall the ungodly race of carnal Jews
    perish … ‘Scatter them abroad, take away their strength. And bring them
    down O Lord.'” “Judaism, since Christ, is a corruption; indeed, Judas is the
    image of the Jewish people: their understanding of Scripture is carnal; they
    bear the guilt for the death of the Savior, for through their fathers they have
    killed Christ.”
  8. And again mirroring Augustine, both were intensely misogynistic against
    women. AUGUSTINE MISOGYNIST QUOTES AGAINST WOMEN:
    “I don’t see what sort of help woman was created to provide man with,
    if one excludes procreation. If woman is not given to man for help in
    bearing children, for what help could she be? To till the earth together?
    If help were needed for that, man would have been a better help for
    man. The same goes for comfort in solitude. How much more pleasure
    is it for life and conversation when two friends live together then when
    a man and a woman co-habitate?”
    “. . . woman was who perhaps still lives more in accordance with the
    promptings of the inferior flesh than by superior reason. Is this why the
    apostle Paul does not attribute the image of God to her?given to man,
    woman who was of small intelligence and”
    “. . . the woman together with her own husband is the image of God, so
    that that whole substance may be one image; but when she is referred
    separately to her quality of help-meet, which regards the woman
    herself alone, then she is not the image of God; but as regards the
    man alone, he is the image of God as fully and completely as when the
    woman too is joined with him in one.”
    “Watch out that she does not twist and turn you for the worse. What
    difference does it make whether it is in a wife or in a mother, provided
    we nonetheless avoid Eve in any woman? “What is the difference
    whether it is in a wife or a mother, it is still Eve the temptress that
    we must beware of in any woman.”

So would you send your wife or daughter to this man for counseling, let alone lay
hands on him to become an elder of your church? God forbid! And will you warn
everyone? In another bizarre irony. Nuns and Nunneries go back at least to the
Fourth Century. Augustine came along two centuries later. So how in the world
could he justify Catholic Nuns, if all they are good for is to produce offspring? And
yet to this day there are Augustinian Nuns and Nunneries named after him!

  1. And finally, Augustine was a Predeterminist, drawing from pagan religions
    that the gods automatically pre-destined your Eternal Destination.

The World Hates Its Own Creator And Savior


 February 21, 2021
Not This Man
“Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber.” (John 18:40)

Unfortunately, this is the attitude of every generation toward its Creator and Redeemer. Jesus Christ “was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not” (John 1:10-11).

“Not this man!” they cried, and still cry today. “We will not have this man to reign over us” (Luke 19:14). Even in a nation founded as a Christian nation, the name of Jesus Christ is banished from the schools, ignored in the halls of government, and blasphemed on the streets.

And whom did they choose instead of “this man”? They preferred Barabbas, who was not only a robber, but also a revolutionary and murderer (Luke 23:19). Today, they idolize the atheist Darwin, or the robber Lenin, or the revolutionary Mao, or the murderer Hitler, or any one of a thousand antichrists; but they will not have Christ.

What, then, will they do with Christ? “Away with him, away with him, crucify him” (John 19:15) was the cry even of the religious leaders during His life here on Earth, and it is little different today. “Ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you,” proclaimed Peter (Acts 3:14). “The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ” (Acts 4:26).

The rejection of Christ today is often more subtle, but it is just as real. Rulers, industrialists, scientists, educators, and commentators all say in deed, if not in word, that “[they] will not have this man to reign over [them]” (Luke 19:14). “But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name” (John 1:12). HMM 
This email was sent to stomson2001@gmail.com | Print this articleUnsubscribe | Subscribe

It is truly hard to fathom how the world turns against its own Creator and Savior…. It is enough to make a grown man cry, Pastor Steve <><

Christian Schools Told To Adopt LGBT Agenda Or Be Shut Down

News Image

By Jonathon Van Maren/Bridgehead.ca November 07, 2018
Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=2705#4jt1oM3Xr6oUMbRv.99

ARTICLE
Christian Schools Told To Adopt LGBT Agenda Or Be Shut Down
image:

The progressive Left is fully aware of the fact that if you want to transform society during your intermittent tenures in government, then you must ensure that the education system does your work for you.

One of the reasons that left-wing governments are typically far more consequential than right-wing governments is the fact that right-wing governments in Canada are often characterized by an utter lack of cultural vision combined with a cowardice that leads them to leave left-wing legislation intact once it has been passed even when they get the opportunity to repeal it.

Thus, the Left simply has to effectively use the time they do have in power, and they can have a far more permanent impact on society than Canada’s conservatives, who have generally ceded the culture to the Left (and thus, in time, the entire country.) When they regain power, they can more or less pick up where they left off.

The NDP’s Education Minister David Eggen has been hard at work on this since the day he took office, launching a two-pronged assault on Alberta’s education system: Transform the curriculum of the public schools, and force the religious schools to either conform to NDP standards, or simply destroy them.

Christian schools were told that they would be forced to establish Gay Straight Alliance Clubs at the request of a single student, and that it would be illegal to tell parents if their children wanted to join it. Predictably — and Eggen and his cronies knew this would happen — many religious schools are unwilling to implement these changes due to the fact that these policies directly conflict with the founding principles of Judeo-Christian institutions.

As religious schools desperately attempt to fight off these attacks on their identity and beliefs in the courts, Premier Rachel Notley’s so-called Ministry of Education has recently revealed that the initial salvoes are just the beginning. Moving beyond issues of lifestyle and sexuality, at least 30 schools across Alberta have received correspondence from the government informing them that there is content in their “Safe and Caring” policies (which were demanded by the NDP) that must be removed.

If the schools refuse to remove the offensive portions, the government could proceed with removing any funding from offending schools, or deny accreditation altogether. In short, the gun is loaded, cocked, and pointed.

And what were these “offensive” portions? It appears that in their short time left in power, the NDP has decided to drop the pretense, remove the mask, and simply declare open war on religious Albertans. Rather than restricting themselves to tirades about homophobia and transphobia and the like, they informed one school that a statement declaring allegiance to “The unchangeable and infallible Word of God” violates their School Act Requirement that “diversity” be respected. (One also suspects that the NDP finds communities that adhere to the Word of God to be frightening places that will clearly be swarming nests of opposition to their secularist utopianism.)

Even further, the NDP found the statement that “We believe men and women were created in the image of God, after his likeness, and therefore have transcendent, intrinsic worth” to be potentially “unwelcoming, uncaring, and/or disrespectful.”

That one is hard to figure out, but perhaps the NDP realizes that a chaotic and amoral Darwinian framework is far more susceptible to accommodating their ideological agenda than the Holy Scriptures. Don’t you dare tell kids that they are made in the image of God, the Albertan government thus demands. You never know what might happen next.

The NDP has laid out their position clearly. God is the enemy, and religious schools must bow the knee or face the furnace. Interestingly, David Eggen’s attempts at gaslighting actually falter when you take a closer look at Canada’s founding documents. When he gives interviews — which is rare, since he is allergic to criticism and questioning — he likes to bloviate about the duty of religious schools to follow the law, never mentioning that these were laws passed recently and specifically to target these schools.

But Mr. Eggen, who finds himself so horribly offended by mentions of God, might want to read Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He has obviously never done so, and one can only imagine the convulsions that would take place at the so-called Ministry of Education if he and his reconstructionists decided to take the time. The preamble states clearly that: “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law … “

Originally published at Bridgehead.ca – reposted with permission.

Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=2705#4jt1oM3Xr6oUMbRv.99

Darwin: Parson or Pagan?

ExplorationFilms.com emailmgr@explorationfilms.com

Darwin: Parson or Pagan?

Somewhere in the last 200 years, it became popular thinking that Charles Darwin was an atheist. His entire life of research has been discarded by some groups who have labeled the scientist as being anti-God, while in actuality, his academic pursuits at Cambridge University began at Christ’s College, where he was studying for the clergy. When Capt. Robert FitzRoy invited Charles Darwin to join the second South American tour of the H.M.S. Beagle, Darwin’s father and sisters feared this would disrupt his career plans in the church. Reluctantly, Darwin’s father was persuaded to let him go on the voyage and the result would change the direction of his life.

Looking back at the culture of the times in the early 1800’s, the clergy was a respectable path for a gentleman with an interest in natural history. His father feared that Darwin’s broad fascination with geology and natural studies would lead him down the path of an idle gentleman, so he encouraged Charles to align these interests with those of God and pursue a life as a country parson, where he could enjoy a quiet life of ministry, all while studying the flora and fauna. Darwin pursued the clergy path despite the influence of his grandfathers, Erasmus Darwin and Josiah Wedgewood, who were both free thinking rationalists and humanists, challenging popular thought on philosophy, politics, religion and science. Passages from Erasmus Darwin’s Zoonomia. ..or the Laws of Organic Life are recorded throughout the younger Darwin’s journals over the years. He entered into his studies as he had his whole life, asking questions.

His curious nature led him into the interest of two men at Cambridge who had the greatest impact on the course of his life. Darwin’s private tutor in math and theology, Rev. John D. Henslow encouraged Darwin as a man of great potential and strongly influenced his hire on the Beagle voyage, agreeing with Professor Adam Sedgwick, a renowned geologist who had tutored Darwin in geological exploration in an 1831 tour of North Wales. Darwin’s tutelage under these two experts had a profound influence upon his confidence as a scientist and the impact of his discoveries on the Beagle voyage. Two books further instilled in Darwin a thirst for science: Sir John Herschel’s Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy and Alexander von Humbolt’s Personal Narrative of the Travels to the Equinoctial Regions of America During the Years 1799-1804.

When he set out on the Beagle after his graduation from Cambridge at the age of 22, there was one additional book that became the rudder for every observation he made on the journey. Charles Lyell’s Principles of Geology, a gift from Beagle’s Capt. FitzRoy, proposed a uniformitarian point of view that sought, in Lyell’s language, “to free science from Moses.” In the church, Darwin was taught that God made the world exactly the way we see it now without taking adaptation into account; however, the changes in species over time that Darwin observed on his voyage proved the church’s point of view to be wrong. If the account of creation in Genesis ran counter to his theory, how could the rest of the Bible be true?

When the H.M.S. Beagle journey began, Darwin’s religious orientation was clearly from a biblical point of view. By the end of his journey, though, he viewed the events of the Bible as more allegory than history. No one can be certain what caused his beliefs to evolve over the course of his journey. Some thought his exposure to the cruelties of slavery on the voyage caused him to question how God could allow such suffering. Others speculated that his observations about adaptation conflicted with the church’s view of the fixity of the human species as God’s perfect creation to a degree that he had to choose sides. His commitment to becoming a parson faded away.

While it is true that his research caused him to question God’s role in the origin of life, at the time he wrote Origin of the Species his belief in the concept of God remained in an intelligent “first cause” of life. It was later in life, following the death of three of his children (he was especially close to his children for a father in his day), that he started calling himself an agnostic. Is it possible that a misguided view of absolute truth led him to discard his faith altogether? Or was his faith in science stronger than his faith in God. Are the two mutually exclusive?

A new film called Darwin: The Voyage that Shook the World examines Darwin’s noted discoveries on board The Beagle in the light of new research in the span of time since that voyage. One hundred and fifty years after The Origin of Species was published, scientists have made discoveries that would cause Darwin to once again stop and ask questions.

Punta Alta
In 1833, Darwin discovered the fossil remains of nine species that he believed to have died elsewhere, transported to the region by water. Giant fossil footprints discovered recently by South American geologist Dr. Emil Silvestru, suggest that animals already living in the region died trying to escape something happening in that flood plain. With this information, would Darwin still believe that the changes in the region took place over a period of centuries?

Puerto Santa Cruz
Darwin thought he found remains of an ancient sea channel in Argentina formed by the ocean rising and lowering over eons, cutting a wide river valley through the continent, from coast to coast. He convinced the ship’s team to travel upstream, only to be cut off 140 miles into their journey. If he had reached the river’s source, Darwin would have discovered the Perito Moreno Glacier. The 97-square mile ice formation was many times its current size during the great Patagonian glaciations and capable of releasing enough melted water to cut a valley like the Santa Cruz channel, 200 miles wide, in a single event. Darwin’s views of geology changing over time did not leave much room for such catastrophes. How would his theory respond to this possibility if he could fly over the Perito Moreno today?

Tiera Del Fuego
Professor Stuart Burges of Bristol University poses that any scientist interpreting empirical data looks at that data with preconceived ideas, assumptions and world views that impact the conclusion. In 1834, Europeans were growing suspicious that non-white races did not possess the moral or mental ability to be elevated to civilized status. Of course, today, this would be interpreted as racism, but in Darwin’s time it was serious science. On Darwin’s voyage, he befriended Jimmy Button, an indigenous Fuegian who traveled to England to become “civilized” and was transported back to Tiera Del Fuego to teach his people the benefits of civilization. When Darwin later visited his old friend, he found they had reverted to “savagery.” Nothing of the English gentleman remained. This observation caused Darwin to question the biblical view that all people descended from Adam and Eve. In his mind, these people had fallen back to a lower state of species. Today, this point of view would be easily refuted, but in Darwin’s day it was a serious scientific conclusion that certain people were “stuck” at an earlier state of evolution.

Coquimbo Region, Chile
By the time the Beagle reached Chile, Darwin’s devotion to Lyell’s theories was seriously challenged. He had started to compare Lyell’s conclusions with his own and rate them. Was he going to follow the idea or the evidence? Lyell believed in the fixity of continents, which required a slow vertical movement. Geologists say that in order to explain the folds and buckling of high mountain regions, you need lateral movement. Today, according to plate tectonics there is a process known as underplating, where there is an injection of magma from the mantle lifting the continents quickly, like earthquakes, creating sudden jolts. Darwin’s firsthand experience of an earthquake in Chile revealed a marked difference between shifts on the islands and shifts on the mainland. That evidence ran counter to his model, so he decided not to use the idea that earthquakes could be the cause of regional uplift. Ocean floor fossils found 150 feet above sea level by current day explorers should be fossilized or decomposed according to Lyell’s theory. This evidence shows the land that was at the bottom of the sea had been uplifted. What would Darwin conclude if he could hold one of those seashells in his hand today?

Uspallata, Argentina
By the time the Beagle had reached Uspallata, Darwin had read three volumes of Lyell and the deep time theory affected his whole thinking. He found the cast of a fossilized tree that he believed to have grown there, buried as the land sank into the ocean. Recent expeditions in the same region unveiled one fossil showing the lower end of a tree. If the tree had grown in that region, there should have been a thick layer of soil and a sign of roots that have rotted over time. The rootless fossil suggests the tree was broken and carried by moving water and sunk rapidly, fossilized by a rapid, catastrophic event.

Galapagos
Darwin spent the last five weeks of his research on the Galapagos Islands, where he collected samples and species from the various islands. Contrary to popular thought, Darwin’s theory of natural selection was not developed on the islands, but largely as a result of the evidence he collected on the islands and took home to England for examination. Because he was locked in the point of view that certain species were created in certain fixed places, he missed vital information. Darwin didn’t record which islands the specimens were collected from. It was on discussions arising from this evidence that Darwin was allowed his first theoretical viewpoint.

A belief in Noah’s ark requires the belief that species can disperse and adapt, which Darwin was seeing all over the Galapagos based on variations in mockingbirds. Yet in his mind, creation was proven wrong because of the church’s fixation at the time that all of creation was fixed and unchanging. The Bible teaching of the day was that God made the world exactly as it is with no variation. This, coupled with a popular intellectual disdain for miracles led Darwin to arrive at the conclusion that if a creator God did exist, a world of suffering and cruelty was proof that He must have abandoned His creation. His attempt to join Lyell in freeing science from the Bible led to the study of hybridization. The definition of a new species is one that will not breed or mate with another species. Darwin had concluded that different types of ground finches have hybridized, but recent research has revealed the hybridization of a land iguana and a marine iguana, each with unique habitats and habits. Darwin’s theory calls for small changes that happen over time, but the population explosion of marine iguanas on the Galapagos suggest that the islands might be younger than estimated, in the realm of thousands of years.

Life Devoted to Research
At home in England while he was away, Darwin’s observations on the Beagle’s voyage were being published and widely distributed. He came home a hero, married, and settled into a life of writing and research in defense of this radical theory that man was not created in God’s image, but descendants of animals. His theory, built on his observations overseas and at home upon the death of three of his children, was built on the fact that the unfit would die and the strong would survive. His own grief and the stress of disputing opponents of his ideas held him back from publishing any conclusions, until an essay on natural selection by Charles Russell Wallace ignited a response. Fifteen months later, On the Origin of Species was published. A lot of his book phrases his discoveries as an invitation to view things another way, but despite much controversy, Darwin spent the rest of his life defending his theory.

What factors in his life – the influence of his freethinking grandfathers, his mother’s Unitarian faith, the Church of England and culture of the time, the personal trauma of losing three children – affected his view of God (and the biblical account of creation) as he was drawing the major conclusions of his theory? What factors of his human nature spurred Darwin to accelerate his conclusions prematurely because of Wallace’s competitive essay? If Charles Darwin held a microscope today, if he could see the structure and complexity of a cell, if he could examine a strand of DNA, how would that affect his belief in random events? These questions, what evolutionists today call “research problems,” are stacking up. Darwin’s defenders would say his evidence is stacking up quite well on its own. But there remains one question: What about the origin of life itself? In the end, Darwin’s efforts to free science from the bible have only proved that they are inseparably linked. Is Darwin’s life’s research really about the evolution of man or the existence of God?

This article is drawn from the facts presented in the DVD, “DARWIN – The Voyage That Shook The World”, released by Exploration Films.

In this expansive documentary the HMS Beagle once again sets sail as it retraces Charles Darwin’s voyage in lavish detail, examining his findings and remarkable conclusions and their implications in the light of modern knowledge.

Filmed in South America, United Kingdom, North America, Australia and Europe, Darwin – The Voyage That Shoot The World features dramatic period recreations and stunning nature cinematography, all interwoven with scholars, scientists and Darwin experts who share differing perspectives on the man and the controversy he stirred.

Check out streaming clips of Darwin and “The Making Of” on the Exploration Films Homepage or Order Now!

©MMIX Exploration Films. All Rights Reserved.